2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art of urine treatment technologies: A critical review.

Abstract: HIGHLIGHTS The last 15 years, we have seen a tremendous development in urine treatment technologies We discuss relevant technologies for reaching eight process-engineering goals (sections 2-8) A few biological as well as physical-chemical technologies have been piloted and are moving towards industrialization There is a boost of experimental electrochemical treatment technologies, which hold promise for on-site installations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
(336 reference statements)
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Larsen et al provide an in-depth analysis of source-separation and decentralization, touching on advantages, challenges, and required technologies. 14,15 In that vein, our analysis of plasma as a technology is presented within the framework of a decentralized treatment scheme. It takes multiple treatment steps to create urine-derived fertilizers, with distinct steps addressing concerns such as concentration of nutrients, aesthetics management, and mitigating biological and chemical contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Larsen et al provide an in-depth analysis of source-separation and decentralization, touching on advantages, challenges, and required technologies. 14,15 In that vein, our analysis of plasma as a technology is presented within the framework of a decentralized treatment scheme. It takes multiple treatment steps to create urine-derived fertilizers, with distinct steps addressing concerns such as concentration of nutrients, aesthetics management, and mitigating biological and chemical contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many patents and scientific papers devoted to improving the performance of this process. Reviews are made by Shi et al [ 38 ], Li et al [ 63 ], Larsen et al [ 64 ], Yakovleva et al [ 65 ], and Krishnamoorthy et al [ 66 ]. The method is quite simple and allows one to obtain fertilizers from residual streams of various composition.…”
Section: Conventional Methods Of the Residual Streams Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages of the method are the complexity and bulkiness of distillation columns design and high energy costs for heating. According to estimates presented in [ 64 ], the energy demand of distillation is around 110 Wh/L.…”
Section: Conventional Methods Of the Residual Streams Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the phosphorus recovered in Scenarios 1 and 2 is of better quality for agricultural use with 44-62% present in plant-available form in northern Finland and 51-74% in northern Sweden. A fraction of the phosphorus in source separated urine and blackwater, will precipitate in plant available form either spontaneously or due to chemical additions used in treatment technologies (such as magnesium or calcium) (Harder et al, 2019;Larsen et al, 2021b). Moreover, the amount of harmful substances like metals in sludge recovered from source separation systems is lower than in sludge from centralised systems (Jönsson et al, 2005;Tidåker et al, 2006b;Viskari et al, 2018;Saliu and Oladoja, 2021).…”
Section: Nutrient Recovery Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%