2008
DOI: 10.1115/1.2894462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art: Hydrogen storage

Abstract: Hydrogen is often considered to be the ultimate energy source for vehicles. However, if hydrogen is to fuel practical vehicles, then the development of fuel cell and hydrogen fueled engine technology must be accompanied by significant improvements in hydrogen storage techniques. Compressed hydrogen storage tanks, liquid hydrogen storage tanks, and containment systems for hydrides are examined to compare their advantages, disadvantages, and potential for onboard and stationary hydrogen storage systems. Each tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proprietary surface treatments that reduce leak rates are believed to be used for many of the liner systems. In addition, multicomponent, multilayered liner systems are being considered [6].…”
Section: Vehicle Fuel Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proprietary surface treatments that reduce leak rates are believed to be used for many of the liner systems. In addition, multicomponent, multilayered liner systems are being considered [6].…”
Section: Vehicle Fuel Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compress hydrogen to 200 bar, 18% of the total energy stored in the tank is spent. 12 Depending on the delivery distance, hydrogen liquefaction could also be considered, as the total capital costs could be reduced. For a 100 km delivery distance, the energy consumed percentage to the delivery is 6.27% for compressed hydrogen, while it is 0.87% for liquid hydrogen.…”
Section: Hydrogen: Supply Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNG vehicles use methane stored at 3000 pia (20.7 MPa) to achieve densities of 10 lb/ft3 (160 kg/m 3 ). High-cost, limited CNG refueling stations and space constraint inside the vehicle for CNG pressure vessels make them not a feasible alternative to petroleum fuels [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%