2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-art and perspectives of the catalytic and electrocatalytic reduction of aqueous nitrates

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. State-of-the-art and perspectives of the catalytic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
299
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
8
299
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under alkaline conditions, the removal percentage of NO3--N (Figure c) was lower than that in neutral and acidic conditions. Because the alkaline conditions are favorable to the adsorption of oxidized materials, such as OH − and Ox − , onto the electrode surface, the existence of these oxides reduces the number of available active centers on the electrode, which hinders the adsorption of NO3- onto the electrode surface (Martínez et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under alkaline conditions, the removal percentage of NO3--N (Figure c) was lower than that in neutral and acidic conditions. Because the alkaline conditions are favorable to the adsorption of oxidized materials, such as OH − and Ox − , onto the electrode surface, the existence of these oxides reduces the number of available active centers on the electrode, which hinders the adsorption of NO3- onto the electrode surface (Martínez et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrocoagulation has several advantages,such as the avoidance of adding chemical agents and a low energy consumption (Ghanbari, Moradi, Mohseni‐Bandpei, et al, ; , ). Electroreduction of nitrate in the polluted water has been reported in the electrocoagulation reactors with the high nitrate removal efficiency (Majlesi, Mohseny, Sardar, Golmohammadi, & Sheikhmohammadi, ; Martínez, Ortiz, & Ortiz, ). Electrocatalytic denitrification is highly efficient, simple to operate, and produces no secondary pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative chemical degradation method for nitrate removal is hydrogenation. 18,19 Nitrate hydrogenation is a spontaneous energy releasing process (G < 0) by which hydrogen gas (H 2 ) is used to reduce nitrate to a potentially more useful or benign form of nitrogen, such as ammonia (NH 3 ) or dinitrogen (N 2 ), respectively (Scheme 1 and Table 1). Scheme 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the removal of nitrate contaminant from water has attracted many attentions and proposed with various methods. Conventional approaches such as biological treatment, ion exchange, adsorption, reverse osmosis, electrochemical, and chemical methods show several limitations (Tyagi et al, 2018) while advanced methods using nanotechnology such as reduction by zero valent iron (Araújo et al, 2016), catalytic and electrocatalytic reduction (Martinez et al, 2017;Garcia-Segura et al, 2018), photocatalytic reduction (Tugaoen et al, 2017;Bahadori et al, 2018), adsorption (Bhatnagar and Sillanpää, 2011;Loganathan et al, 2013;Singh et al, 2018) emerge as potential technologies. Among these methods, adsorption using new and effective nanomaterials could be a very promising technology, which can remove nitrate from water and wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%