2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02811-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 It is difficult to estimate the exact size of the fascia required for standard closure. Unlike meshes, the fascia does not need to be 1 cm wider than the hernia defect 21 ; however, the exact shaping and cutting of the fascia to maintain adequate tension remains more of an art than science. If we extrapolate the evidence derived from the use of meshes in conventional repairs, we should use a mesh concomitantly with the fascia to cover defects larger than 7.5 cm to maintain tensile strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 It is difficult to estimate the exact size of the fascia required for standard closure. Unlike meshes, the fascia does not need to be 1 cm wider than the hernia defect 21 ; however, the exact shaping and cutting of the fascia to maintain adequate tension remains more of an art than science. If we extrapolate the evidence derived from the use of meshes in conventional repairs, we should use a mesh concomitantly with the fascia to cover defects larger than 7.5 cm to maintain tensile strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%