2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11334-014-0232-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of practice in requirements engineering: contemporary data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural language is the most adopted notation for requirements [32]. Unfortunately, text does not readily provide a holistic view of the involved entities and relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Natural language is the most adopted notation for requirements [32]. Unfortunately, text does not readily provide a holistic view of the involved entities and relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The premise of our research is the high adoption yet low quality of user stories in industry [32,37,38]. To improve this situation, we focus on fostering deeper understanding of user stories by creating tool-assisted techniques that support practitioners in creating and communicating about high-quality user stories [36,39].…”
Section: Baseline: the Grimm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this analysis we take into consideration also the answers given by people who partially completed the questionnaire for statistical analysis not requiring pairing or correlating information, as suggested in [11]. Given this population, responses to the survey are more likely to reflect the opinions and biases of any given projects development team rather than those of other groups represented in a software development effort.…”
Section: Profiles Of the Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%