2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2017.2728201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Observation and Sensor Selection for Nonlinear Networks

Abstract: A large variety of dynamical systems, such as chemical and biomolecular systems, can be seen as networks of nonlinear entities. Prediction, control, and identification of such nonlinear networks require knowledge of the state of the system. However, network states are usually unknown, and only a fraction of the state variables are directly measurable. The observability problem concerns reconstructing the network state from this limited information. Here, we propose a general optimization-based approach for obs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical value of nonzero entries of J depends on the operating (linearization) point, however the zero-nonzero pattern of J is irrespective of the operating point [41]. Therefore, the structural observability results are valid for linearization of nonlinear systems [40].…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical value of nonzero entries of J depends on the operating (linearization) point, however the zero-nonzero pattern of J is irrespective of the operating point [41]. Therefore, the structural observability results are valid for linearization of nonlinear systems [40].…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Qi et al [12] utilize the concept of empirical Gramians to obtain a measure towards observability in NDS, which is then used to determine the location of phasor measurement unit in power networks. Next, Haber et al [13] present a method for reconstructing the initial states x(t 0 ) of NDS while optimally selecting sensors for a given observation window. It has been argued in [13] that the proposed approach is computationally more tractable than the one in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is arguable that works grounded on crisp definitions of observability (controllability), such as Lin's structural definition [33,9] and following works [35,36], are not really apt to classify if a certain set of sensor nodes is really the best one or even if its feasible. Indeed, the pioneering methods of Liu et al [35,36] have been shown to underestimate the required set of sensor [23,32] and driver [20,27,47] nodes. A natural approach to circumvent this problem is to extend metrics that gradually quantify system observability (controllability), under a specific set of sensor (driver) nodes, to a network context [39,21,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowan et al [14] show that significantly different results could be derived by considering the presence of self-edges that dictate the independent dynamic behaviour of any given node. This includes a new level of depth to the observability problem of network systems, specially when nonlinear dynamics are considered [14,39,21,45,44,27,23,5,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation