2017
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6649a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Laws Regarding Indoor Public Use, Retail Sales, and Prices of Electronic Cigarettes — U.S. States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, September 30, 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information about whether and when state laws regarding e-cigarettes were implemented was derived for all the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam according to the CDC State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System. 33 Consistent with a recent report by the CDC, 33 US states were classified according to whether the state has implemented each type of the following state laws: prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor areas of private workplaces, restaurants, and bars; requiring retailers to purchase a license to sell e-cigarettes;…”
Section: Ascertainment Of State Laws Regarding E-cigarettesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information about whether and when state laws regarding e-cigarettes were implemented was derived for all the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam according to the CDC State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System. 33 Consistent with a recent report by the CDC, 33 US states were classified according to whether the state has implemented each type of the following state laws: prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor areas of private workplaces, restaurants, and bars; requiring retailers to purchase a license to sell e-cigarettes;…”
Section: Ascertainment Of State Laws Regarding E-cigarettesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Some states have adopted multiple laws, whereas others have not. 32,33 Previous studies 4,34,35 have found substantial variations in the prevalence of current e-cigarette use among adults across US states; however, the association of state laws regarding e-cigarettes with e-cigarette use is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, opportunities exist for states and localities to give an estimated 243.6 million U.S. residents, including 55.7 million children, greater protection from secondhand EVP aerosol exposure in indoor public places. 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, three quarters (75.4%) of the U.S. population live in states where EVP use is not prohibited in indoor areas of all worksites, restaurants, and bars.2 This is a public health concern because EVP use in these settings can expose bystanders to secondhand aerosol,3, 4, 5 complicate enforcement of existing smoke-free policies, and influence the social acceptability of tobacco use 1, 2 6. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As countries increasingly consider constraining smoking and vaping in outdoor settings, 8,9 it is important to base such policies on objective data. Vaping can be done stealthily 10 and the devices can be pocketed between puffs, so observers may be less likely to see vaping compared to smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%