2012
DOI: 10.1177/0895904811417581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Implementation of Language Acquisition Policies and Reading Achievement Among Hispanic Students

Abstract: National Assessment of Educational Progress data were analyzed to assess differences in reading achievement for Hispanic fourth graders across states with varying policies on language acquisition, controlling for student and school characteristics. Results indicated that (a) both Hispanic English language learner (ELL) and non-ELL students in states with stronger bilingual emphasis and more Title III funding have significantly higher reading achievement, (b) more preservice training on ELL issues and more prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A child’s native language must be valued, and the new language must be taught in meaningful ways. These estimates are widely cited and accepted by language policy researchers (de Jong, 2013; Gándara & Merino, 1993; Lopez & McEneaney, 2012; Salazar, 1998; Wiese & Garcia, 2013). This cognitive reality is at odds with the United States’ adherence to a 4-year high school model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A child’s native language must be valued, and the new language must be taught in meaningful ways. These estimates are widely cited and accepted by language policy researchers (de Jong, 2013; Gándara & Merino, 1993; Lopez & McEneaney, 2012; Salazar, 1998; Wiese & Garcia, 2013). This cognitive reality is at odds with the United States’ adherence to a 4-year high school model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In sum, teachers who enact CRT affirm the cultural backgrounds of students, and are able to connect instruction to students' funds of knowledge-the culturally developed skills, resources, language, and knowledge that are present in students' homes, families, and communities [30]. When teachers acknowledge students' home languages as assets, students' identities are validated which in turn supports their achievement [31,32]. Language, then, provides an important conduit for considering the use and implementation of CRT.…”
Section: Comprehensive and Inclusive Culturally Responsivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S., seven models of instruction are employed to teach emergent bilinguals (EBs) 1 who are dominant in a language other than English: Sheltered English Instruction, Structured English Immersion (SEI), English as a Second Language (ESL) Pull-out, ESL Push-in, and three models of Transitional Bilingual Instruction: Early-exit, Late-exit, and Dual Language (DL), one-way or two-way. The goal of Sheltered English Instruction, Structured English Immersion (SEI), and ESL programs is to expose children to English to increase their English proficiency and help them acclimate into American culture [32,33].…”
Section: Language Instruction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results may be significantly lower due to the lack of training of content area teachers, as it pertains to their exposure to teaching diverse student populations. Based upon the previous research of López and McEneaney (2012), teachers that were provided with professional development and strategies to effectively work with ELs, improved the reading and language arts proficiency of ELs.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Mean Of English Language Arts Tcap Scale Scorementioning
confidence: 99%