State Gun-Control, Gun-Rights, and Preemptive Firearm-Related Laws Across 50 US States for 2009–2018

Abstract

Objectives. To assess state policy environments and the relationship between state gun-control, gun-rights, and preemptive firearm-related laws in the United States. Methods. In 2019 through 2020, we evaluated substantive firearm laws and preemptive firearm laws across 50 US states for 2009 through 2018. For each state, we compared substantive measures with preemptive measures on the same policy topic for 2018. Results. The presence of state firearm-related laws varied across states, but with the exception of “punitive preemption” the number of gun-control, gun-rights, and preemptive measures remained unchanged in most states from 2009 through 2018. As of 2018, a majority of states had preemptive measures on almost all gun-control policy topics without enacting substantive gun-control measures. Several states had a combination of gun-control and preemptive measures. Only a small number of states had gun-control measures with few to no preemptive measures. Conclusions. Even where state legislators were unable to pass statewide gun-rights measures, they succeeded in passing preemption, preserving state authority over a wide range of gun-control and gun-rights policy topics. The majority of states used preemption as a tool to support policy frameworks favoring gun rights. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 10, 2021: e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306287 )

Bullet holes: A novel model to identify the most impactful gaps in the firearm homicide prevention laws of each state

“…5 Conversely, law categories intended to protect firearm access or use (i.e., stand your ground, immunity and preemption), were coded as present if there was no such law in place for any year in the preceding 7 years. 11,17,18,[22][23][24] In this manner, the presumed direction of association between FH and presence of a law category was consistent across all law categories. We also retrieved the total number of firearm laws present in each state, which is evidenced to impact FH within a state and its neighbors.…”

An Appraisal Analysis on Joe Biden’s Rhetoric of Gun Control

“…However, despite the thorough process, gun possession in the U.S. is protected by the law-the second amendment-to be exact. The U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment has been read to safeguard the majority of gun ownership, and according to the preponderant judicial view, it offers strong protection for gun rights (Pomeranz et al, 2021). The constitution reads -A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.‖.…”

State Preemption of Consumer Merchandise and Beverage Containers: New Strategy to Preempt Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Policies?

“…[1][2][3][4][5] Preemption is especially concerning when health disparities are caused by inequities that are not obvious or present on a state-wide level or when states do not enact laws to address the topics preempted. 2,3 Although preemption provisions are sometimes straightforward, state legislators have used specific tactics to obscure preemption. 6 For example, a Kansas bill preempting a wide range of food and nutrition policies used unclear language making it difficult for legislators and advocacy organizations to discern exactly what was preempted.…”

“…State preemption occurs when the state legislature withdraws or limits the authority of local governments to act on a specific topic 1. Such preemption creates challenges for communities seeking to protect and promote public health through evidence-based or innovative policy strategies 1–5. Preemption is especially concerning when health disparities are caused by inequities that are not obvious or present on a state-wide level or when states do not enact laws to address the topics preempted 2,3…”

“…evidence-based or innovative policy strategies. [1][2][3][4][5] Preemption is especially concerning when health disparities are caused by inequities that are not obvious or present on a state-wide level or when states do not enact laws to address the topics preempted. 2,3 Although preemption provisions are sometimes straightforward, state legislators have used specific tactics to obscure preemption.…”