2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State estimation using model order reduction for unstable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If A has a simple eigenvalue zero, as in our case, there exists an α > 0, such that the matrix A − αI is Hurwitz. For linear systems the shifting can be interpreted as a discounting of the controllability and observability functionals that renders the associated Gramians finite [15].…”
Section: Sparsity Preserving Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If A has a simple eigenvalue zero, as in our case, there exists an α > 0, such that the matrix A − αI is Hurwitz. For linear systems the shifting can be interpreted as a discounting of the controllability and observability functionals that renders the associated Gramians finite [15].…”
Section: Sparsity Preserving Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [71] it is assumed that the time-dependent system underlying the problem has a time-invariant dominant part on which balanced truncation is performed. MOR via balanced truncation was also proposed for incremental 4D-Var in [25,26,124,125]. Model and observation operators are projected as in (34), x is restricted tox = U T x ∈ R r , r ≪ n, and the background error covariance matrix, B, is projected onto U T BU.…”
Section: Model Order Reduction Applied To the Forward Model Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method the probability density function of the observation errors are assumed to be a weighted combination of a standard Gaussian distribution and a flat probability distribution function, with the weights determined by the probability of gross error of the observation. Thus for each single observation y with weight α y , the probability density function of the observation error is assumed to be of the form 14) where P N indicates the appropriate Gaussian probability density function and P F is a flat distribution over a finite interval centred at zero and is equal to zero outside this interval (the size of this interval is taken to be a multiple of the observation error standard deviation). The observation part of the cost function is then taken to be equal to the negative logarithm of P QC .…”
Section: Observation Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method the snapshot perturbations X are weighted according the sensitivity of the cost function at the time of the snapshot, where the weights are calculated using the adjoint model [30]. The other approach, put forward in the series of papers [76], [75], [14], is to use near-optimal model order reduction methods for linear dynamical systems to derive a reduced order model and observation operator. The inner loop problem of incremental 4D-Var (2.15) is subject to the dynamical system described by the evolution equation (216) and the output equation…”
Section: Reduced Order Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation