2015
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2014.2335611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Estimation in Two Time Scales for Smart Distribution Systems

Abstract: The monitoring of distribution systems relies on a critical set of pseudomeasurements and a varying but low number of redundant measurements. In the light of the different refreshing rates of both types of information, this paper considers a state estimation model structured in two time scales. Possibilities and limitations of the proposed model are discussed, and illustrated on a real distribution system comprising a diversity of load patterns.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first category comprises readings from the SCADA system as well as pseudo-measurements. Legacy measurements are typically obtained at time intervals of T = 15 minutes 1 [15] and include: squared voltage magnitudes, |V m | 2 for m ∈ V; power flows at the branches, given by S m,l = P m,l + jQ m,l = V m I * m,l for (m, l) ∈ B ; power injections, given by S m = P m + jQ m = V m I * m for m ∈ V and squared branch current magnitudes, |I m,l | 2 for (m, l) ∈ B. In contrast, the sampling period of µPMUs t = T /q is smaller, typically on the order of few milliseconds [26], and provide the DG operator with updated snapshots of complex bus voltages, V m = {V m } + j {V m } for m ∈ V. Notice that legacy measurements are non-linear functions of the system state, whereas µPMU measurements turn out to be linear ones.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first category comprises readings from the SCADA system as well as pseudo-measurements. Legacy measurements are typically obtained at time intervals of T = 15 minutes 1 [15] and include: squared voltage magnitudes, |V m | 2 for m ∈ V; power flows at the branches, given by S m,l = P m,l + jQ m,l = V m I * m,l for (m, l) ∈ B ; power injections, given by S m = P m + jQ m = V m I * m for m ∈ V and squared branch current magnitudes, |I m,l | 2 for (m, l) ∈ B. In contrast, the sampling period of µPMUs t = T /q is smaller, typically on the order of few milliseconds [26], and provide the DG operator with updated snapshots of complex bus voltages, V m = {V m } + j {V m } for m ∈ V. Notice that legacy measurements are non-linear functions of the system state, whereas µPMU measurements turn out to be linear ones.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the latter can only rely on the observations coming from a reduced number of µPMUs and the possibly available zero power injections. 1 With respect to system observability, SCADA observations and pseudomeasurements are sufficiently available every 15 minutes [15].…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problems brought by it ultimately improve the accuracy of state estimation. In reference [7], the author used the curve fitting method to make up for the data of the measurement system with low data refresh frequency, but the data accuracy needs to be improved. In reference [8], the author mainly considered the impact of PMU data on the accuracy of state estimation, but did not mention the data difference between different systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesse crescente de governos e concessionárias em desenvolver e implantar as chamadas redes inteligentes (ou Smart Grids) [6,91];…”
Section: Conclusõesunclassified