State Estimation in the Cerebellum

Abstract

An exciting hypothesis about the cerebellum is that its role is one of state estimation-a process that combines efferent copies of motor commands with afferent sensory signals to produce a representation of the current status of the peripheral motor system. Sensory inputs alone cannot provide a perfect state signal because of inevitable delays in their afferent pathways. We have recently reported the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the ipsilateral cerebellum as healthy subjects made rapid reaching movements towards visually defined targets (Miall et al. in PLoS Biology 5:2733-2744, 2007. Errors in the initial direction and in the final finger position of this reachto-target movement were consistent with the reaching movements being planned and initiated from an estimated hand position that was about 138 ms out of date. This interval is consistent with estimates of the delays in sensory motor pathways that would inform the central nervous system of the peripheral status. We now report new data using the same paradigm, testing the effects of varying the TMS stimulus train from one, two, or three pulses. We show that the errors in movement are relatively insensitive to the TMS pulse-train duration. The estimated time interval by which the hand position is mislocalized varied by only 12 ms as the TMS train duration increased by 100 ms. Thus, this interval is likely to reflect physiological processes within the cerebellum rather than the TMSstimulus duration. This new evidence supports our earlier claim that the cerebellum is responsible for predictively updating a central state estimate over an interval of about 120-140 ms. Dysfunction of the cerebellum, whether through disease or experimental procedures, leads to motor errors consistent with a loss of knowledge of the true state of the motor system.

Internal modeling of upcoming speech: A causal role of the right posterior cerebellum in non-motor aspects of language production

“…In that way, a means is provided to detect any unpredicted sensorial data entailing that correction of the motor command is required (Wolpert, Ghahramani & Jordan, 1995). The posterior lobes of the cerebellum (laterality depending on the task) constitute the hypothetical center of this internal modeling of motor actions (Blakemore & Sirigu, 2003;Blakemore et al, 1998;Blakemore et al, 2001;Imamizu et al, 2000;Miall & King, 2008). Cerebellar activity is modulated by the presence and predictability of the consequences of self-generated movements (e.g., Blakemore et al, 1998;.…”

Effective Connectivity of the Human Cerebellum during Visual Attention

“…Converging theoretical foundations of cerebellar functioning have been formulated by several authors (Schmahmann, 1997;Wolpert et al, 1998) and have been augmented more recently (Paulin, 2005;Ito, 2008;Miall and King, 2008). Generally speaking, these theories act on the need of (even simple) organisms to interact with their environment, which is arranged of (moving) objects in space and time.…”

Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control

“…Both continuous and intermittent models of the human control system assume the availability of internal models for state estimation and prediction; there is some evidence that internal models have a physiological basis (Miall and Wolpert 1996;Wolpert et al 1998;Bays et al 2005;Dean and Porrill 2008;Miall and King 2008;Lewis and Miall 2009). This paper presents an intermittent controller based on the well-established OPF model but with the addition of a system-matched hold and an event-driven sampler.…”