2015
DOI: 10.14485/hbpr.2.5.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Education Standards for Tobacco Prevention and Classroom Instruction

Abstract: Objectives We examine whether state educational standards regarding tobacco correspond with teacher reports of classroom instruction. Methods We test this relation with data on tobacco use prevention standards, reports of middle and high school teachers from the 2008 and 2010 School Health Profiles study, and logistic regression models. Results State education standards are significantly related to increased likelihood of a lead health education teacher in that state reporting that the specific topic was t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we do not observe some important characteristics of the teachers or schools. Regarding teachers, whereas we do have evidence that state ATOD education standards correlate positively with teacher reports of ATOD instruction (Carpenter, Bruckner, Domina, Gerlinger, & Wakefield, 2015), we do not observe how well prepared or efficacious they are in delivering ATOD instruction. Regarding schools, we do not observe the content or enforcement of other policies toward youth substance use.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Second, we do not observe some important characteristics of the teachers or schools. Regarding teachers, whereas we do have evidence that state ATOD education standards correlate positively with teacher reports of ATOD instruction (Carpenter, Bruckner, Domina, Gerlinger, & Wakefield, 2015), we do not observe how well prepared or efficacious they are in delivering ATOD instruction. Regarding schools, we do not observe the content or enforcement of other policies toward youth substance use.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%