2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-dependent valuation learning in fish: Banded tetras prefer stimuli associated with greater past deprivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As measured by the proportion of responses on either alternative during the 20 choice test trials, all twelve subjects significantly preferred to respond to the colored key that had been correlated with food under high deprivation, and this preference was exhibited when tested under both high and low deprivation levels. Similar results have been reported with replications using locusts (Pompilio et al, 2006), pigeons (Vasconcelos and Urcuioli, 2008), and fish (Aw et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As measured by the proportion of responses on either alternative during the 20 choice test trials, all twelve subjects significantly preferred to respond to the colored key that had been correlated with food under high deprivation, and this preference was exhibited when tested under both high and low deprivation levels. Similar results have been reported with replications using locusts (Pompilio et al, 2006), pigeons (Vasconcelos and Urcuioli, 2008), and fish (Aw et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mechanism(s) underlying our observed choice of familiar diet is unknown, but these findings open up numerous possibilities for future research focused on mechanisms of learning such as cognitive biases, neophobia [17], decision rules in complex environment [3] and the modelling of the proximate architecture of decision-making [18]. Seemingly irrational decisions in animals can result from cognitive biases such as state-dependent valuation learning, in which individuals prefer options previously found to be rewarding when in a state of need (reviewed in [3,19]). The presumed differences in nutritional value of rotten versus fresh crickets (based on our observation of reduced survival) suggest that individuals fed rotten cricket diets were likely under nutritional stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point we are making for learning can underlie observed irrationalities such as the Concorde (in evolutionary biology) or Sunk Cost (in economics) fallacies [6]–[8] and ‘within-trial contrast’ in experimental psychology [9], [10]. To elaborate this point, consider how an unwarranted preference can be caused by learning history: consuming two prey of equal body mass causes the same energy gain and should be treated indifferently, but if typically one of them has higher searching costs, the costly one would have been experienced under greater need and would elicit a memory for higher hedonic impact [11]–[18], leading to it being preferred. The rationale can be extended to the effect of context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%