2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-dependent changes of connectivity patterns and functional brain network topology in autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Anatomical and functional brain studies have converged to the hypothesis that Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are associated with atypical connectivity. Using a modified resting-state paradigm to drive subjects' attention, we provide evidence of a very marked interaction between ASD brain functional connectivity and cognitive state. We show that functional connectivity changes in opposite ways in ASD and typicals as attention shifts from external world towards one's body generated information. Furthermore, ASD… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the default mode network (DMN), the most prominent functional network at rest, is most active when subjects direct attention to inward processes, such as daydreaming or imagining (6). Furthermore, when a subject is interrupted during the resting state, functional connectivity patterns at the time of interruption can partially predict whether a subject was imagining or mind wandering (7,8), and what was the focus of attention (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the default mode network (DMN), the most prominent functional network at rest, is most active when subjects direct attention to inward processes, such as daydreaming or imagining (6). Furthermore, when a subject is interrupted during the resting state, functional connectivity patterns at the time of interruption can partially predict whether a subject was imagining or mind wandering (7,8), and what was the focus of attention (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniqueness of our work is twofold: First, it distinctively identifies networks that covary with objective (type I) performance on a visual task and metacognitive accuracy (type II). Second, it measures functional networks in different attentional states to examine whether a relatively narrow library of networks of stable mental states may be better indicators of individual traits than measures of resting state per se (16,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This connectivity matrix produces a weighted graph in which each electrode corresponds to a node and each link is determined by the SL of an electrode pair. To calculate network measures, SL matrices were converted to binary undirected matrices by applying a threshold T. We explored a broad range of values of 0.01 < T < 0.2, with increments of 0.0005, and we repeated the full analysis for each value of T. Based on previous works [35,36,37,38,39,40], graph theory metrics [41] were performed on these thresholded matrices, measuring the clustering coefficient C, the characteristic path length L and the modularity index MI of brain networks, using the BCT toolbox [41]. Finally, we performed ANOVAs with group (CT or patients) and T (binned in 8) as independent factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%