2021
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2020.3020034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Constraints Adaptive Backstepping Control for Active Magnetic Bearings With Parameters Nonstationarities and Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion of the DOB for AMB system can be found in [5][6][7][8]. The discussion of the AMB system with the presence of uncertainty variation can be found [9]. The development of the AMB system has been lasting until recent years with the highly advanced control techniques such as in [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion of the DOB for AMB system can be found in [5][6][7][8]. The discussion of the AMB system with the presence of uncertainty variation can be found [9]. The development of the AMB system has been lasting until recent years with the highly advanced control techniques such as in [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang D designed an adaptive backstepping controller for the active magnetic bearing to reduce the uncertainties of system parameters. 10 Also, modern control methods are applied to maglev systems, such as the H-infinity control method, 11,12 the fuzzy control method, 13 and the sliding model control method. 14,15 Sun proposed a permanent magnetic levitation (PML) system with the variable magnetic flux, which could avoid adhering by adjusting to zero levitation force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, it will cause performance degradation and system damage. A lot of methods had been investigated to solve this issue, including set invariance notions [31], reference governors [32], model predictive control [33], nevertheless, after the barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) method has been designed, the most commonly used methods to solve the constraint problem is the design based on BLF, such as some conventional BLF [34]- [39], and some novel BLF [40]- [42]. While there are some deficiencies in BLF-based design, the redesign as the Lyapunov function changes, the structure of complex controller, the selection interval of initial value, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%