2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State‐conditional Fertilizer Yield Response on Western Kenyan Farms

Abstract: Fertilizer interventions have attained prominence in rural poverty reduction programs in Africa. Using data from maize plots operated by small farmers in western Kenya, we find a von Liebig-type relationship between soil organic matter (SOM) and maize yield response to nitrogen application. Low SOM commonly limits the yield response to mineral fertilizer application. Although fertilizer is, on average, profitable in our sample, on roughly one-third of the plots degraded soils limit the marginal productivity of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
149
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effects of these kinds of programmes are highly asymmetric across the distributions of farm size and wealth. This is mainly due to the fact that poor households tended to receive proportionately less of the subsidy than wealthier farmers Marenya & Barrett, 2009;Ricker-Gilbert & Jayne, 2012;Tittonell & Giller, 2013). Rural headcount poverty rates in Zambia have consistently floated around 80 per cent throughout the 10-year period of the implementation of the farm input support programme (Mason & Jayne, 2013).…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects of these kinds of programmes are highly asymmetric across the distributions of farm size and wealth. This is mainly due to the fact that poor households tended to receive proportionately less of the subsidy than wealthier farmers Marenya & Barrett, 2009;Ricker-Gilbert & Jayne, 2012;Tittonell & Giller, 2013). Rural headcount poverty rates in Zambia have consistently floated around 80 per cent throughout the 10-year period of the implementation of the farm input support programme (Mason & Jayne, 2013).…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with this reality, peasants are finding ways to manage or recover soils and agroecosystems that have been severely degraded by chemicals, machines, excessive mechanization, and the loss of functional biodiversity caused by the indiscriminate use of Green Revolution technologies (Lal 2009). Severe degradation means that even the ability to mask underlying causes with ever higher doses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides is limited (Marenya and Barrett 2009), and the cost of doing so is, in any event, becoming prohibitive, as prices of petroleum-derived farm inputs have soared in recent years (USDA 2011). This often leaves agroecology and DFS as the only alternatives open to small farmers (LVC 2010a).…”
Section: Theory: Agroecology Disputed Territories and Re-peasantizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors 14, 17, 2328 have documented a number of structural biases against poor rural households (as summarized by Taylor and García-Barrios (1999) 16 :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%