State Building and the Limits of Legibility: Kinship Networks and Kurdish Resistance in Turkey

Abstract

Following the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923, the twin goals of centralizing state power and inscribing a uniform national identity on all citizens resulted in the proliferation of disciplinary practices that required changes in habits and everyday life as well as in the locus of faith, allegiance, and obedience. Nowhere were the repercussions felt as deeply as in the Kurdish regions, where the urge to create a new citizen sparked considerable resistance. This article suggests that alongside Kurdish nationalist movements, kinship networks and morality constituted an alternative reservoir of resistance to the new disciplinary practices that followed state building. By subverting state practices to make citizens legible, kinship networks, I argue, undermined the state's attempts to establish bureaucratic authority and create an exclusive identity.

Civilianizing Civil Conflict: Civilian Defense Militias and the Logic of Violence in Intrastate Conflict

“…Macdonald 2014), as well as developing states' governance strategies (e.g. Ahram 2011;Belge 2011;Holden 2004;Thomson 1994;Tilly 2003). We show that while actors commonly use civilians as a source of information on insurgents, this leads to increased insurgent targeting of civilians and more deadly civil conflicts.…”

“…Civilian defense forces have a unique ability to reduce the identification problem. We see this as part of a wider effort on behalf of states to make their citizenry "legible" (Belge 2011). In addition to this intelligence function, leveraging civilian defense forces is a political tool to increase civilian support for the incumbent.…”

From the October Revolution to Revolutionary Rojava: An Ecosocialist Reading

“…By using this strategy, the PKK have addressed "the problem of national oppression and gendered inequalities by reconstructing and linking a golden age of a matriarchal society and goddesses with the current struggle of the Kurds" (Açık 2014, 132; see also White 2015, 133-136). Recruitment efforts have been thereby facilitated, successfully legitimising the struggle among even the most conservative Kurdish communities, especially those resisting the state through a kinship-based organisation (Belge 2011;but compare Güneser 2015). The Rojava Revolution hence features military institutions that are general, the YPG (People's Protection Units), and women's only, the YPJ (Women's Protection Units).…”

Terrorism versus insurgency: a conceptual analysis

“…Such an approach discusses the nature of the violence from jus in bello perspective, that is, illegitimacy versus legitimacy in how the fight is carried out. 9 By relying on these perspectives, this section discusses PKK violence in the context of terrorism and insurgency, and questions its linkages and relations to one another. It portrays the structures and changing character of PKK violence as the conflict unfolds by thoroughly analyzing the PKK violence and its organizational characteristics.…”