State broadband policy: Impacts on availability

Abstract

We use a county-level panel dataset from 2012 to 2018 to assess the impacts of various state policies on total and rural broadband availability in the United States. The primary dependent variable is the percentage of residents with access to 25 Megabits per second (MBPS) download and 3 MBPS upload speeds via a fixed connection, with alternative specifications considering other aspects of availability such as technology type and competition. We control for the main determinants of Internet availability such as income, education, age, and population density. Our policy variables come from the newly released State Broadband Policy Explorer from the Pew Charitable Trusts and individual contacts from the nationwide State Broadband Leaders Network. Our primary policies of interest are those related to: (1) availability of state-level funding, (2) existence of a state-level broadband office/task force with full-time employees, and (3) restrictions on municipal/cooperative broadband provision. We find a positive and significant impact of state-level funding programs on general (and fiber) broadband availability, and a negative impact of municipal/cooperative restrictions. The findings are similar when the analysis is restricted to the rural portions of counties.

Broadband adoption and availability: Impacts on rural employment during COVID-19

“…State-level control of technology neutral dollars gives communities and regions control on how the investments are made (i.e., they may deploy stop-gap solutions such as fixed-wireless as they wait for fiber installation). This Federal investment should create faster and more reliable internet in rural communities by inducing ISPs to serve less profitable markets ( Whitacre and Gallardo, 2020 ), and $40 billion should make a dent in total need ( Low, 2020 ). Roll-out, however, will not be quick or straightforward due to tight labor market conditions and supply-chain issues, such as fiber cable shortages.…”

A broadband integrated time series (BITS) for longitudinal analyses of the digital divide

“…First, in panel assessments, time fixed effects will be critical to include for modeling variations related to changes in reporting requirements as described in section 2.1. Also, the Form 477 data may overstate the actual coverage of people and businesses [ 56 , 57 ]. This possibility for overstating coverage is related to several facets of these data.…”

An Assets-Based Response to the Digital Divide: Success for One Summer Youth Employment Program Serving a Minoritized Community During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Physical and material access continues to be a pointed concern highlighted by public virtual schooling during the pandemic (Lieberman, 2020). The Federal Communications Commission advises that access to broadband networks are necessary to support even moderate use by multiple internet users in a household, however Broadband availability highly correlates with income, education level, and population density (FCC, 2020;Whitacre & Gallardo, 2020). Researchers discovered a socioeconomic status divide causing technological maintenance differences thus impacting their academic outcomes based on students' families' accessibility to maintain their devices and manage technological disruptions (Gonzales, McCrory Calarco, & Lynch, 2020).…”