2012
DOI: 10.1080/00411450.2012.672359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Based Adjoint Method for Reduced Order Modeling

Abstract: Introduced here is an adjoint state-based method for model reduction, which provides a single solution to two classes of reduction methods that are currently in the literature. The first class, which represents the main subject of this manuscript, is concerned with linear time invariant problems where one is interested in calculating linear responses variations resulting from initial conditions perturbations. The other class focuses on perturbations introduced in the operator, which result in nonlinear respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, an "Adjoint Proper Orthogonal Decomposition" method is proposed which is aimed at combining the feature of the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for the spatial basis functions and the adjoint function as test functions. This approach can be intended to some extent as the counterpart of what presented in (Bang et al, 2012b) but applied to the projection-based framework (instead of the interpolation-based one). In order to assess the capability of the APOD method, a comparison with other couples of spatial basis functions and test functions is performed.…”
Section: Spatial Basis Calculation and The Adjoint Proper Orthogonal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, an "Adjoint Proper Orthogonal Decomposition" method is proposed which is aimed at combining the feature of the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for the spatial basis functions and the adjoint function as test functions. This approach can be intended to some extent as the counterpart of what presented in (Bang et al, 2012b) but applied to the projection-based framework (instead of the interpolation-based one). In order to assess the capability of the APOD method, a comparison with other couples of spatial basis functions and test functions is performed.…”
Section: Spatial Basis Calculation and The Adjoint Proper Orthogonal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are usually divided into two steps, an offline step carried out once and an online step for each new calculation. In reactor physics, Proper Orthogonal Decomposition [5,6] or Principal Component Analysis in statistics [7] are commonly used for the creation of the basis. The basis can be constructed using a range-finding algorithm which captures the active subspace of our problem and provides an a posteriori estimator for the precision [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Galerkin projection allows solving a reduced order system instead of the full one [10]. Differently, adjoint based reduced order model uses the adjoint equation to calculate the projection coefficients [6]. Hence, one does not solve a reduced order system but simply calculates the projection of the solution on the reduced basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nuclear engineering, efficient basis construction algorithms based on randomized subspace methodologies have been proposed and their feasibility to reactor physics applications has been demonstrated. For example, the state-level reduction technique was incorporated into initial condition perturbation theory to reduce the number of adjoint mode runs [2]. The parameter-level reduction technique was applied to second order sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assembly Model (PB-2 BWR) PWR Assembly Model (WB-2 PWR) SCALE Assembly ModelSuppose that the models can be expressed as: is the variations in system configurations, i.e. fuel/moderator temperatures or nuclide number densities, -0      is the effective macroscopic cross section changes, values of system configurations, effective macroscopic cross sections and k-eigenvalue, respectively, f represents a resonance calculation (BONAMI) g represents a transport calculation (NEWT)2 the nuclides in different mixtures are counted as different nuclides though there are the same isotopes because they are depleted differently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%