2014
DOI: 10.1090/conm/619/12391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State and Time Transformations of Infinite Horizon Optimal Control Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of immunized individuals shows a larger difference: 5 282 (constant maximum vaccination rate) versus 4 781 individuals (optimal control on finite horizont). The effect with respect to the terminal behaviour of the approximate control may be unexpected on the first glance but is typical for optimal control problems which should be modelled on an infinite horizont but are truncated by a finite horizont; see [12], [11], [19], and [26]. This can be interpreted as devil-may-care solution.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the number of immunized individuals shows a larger difference: 5 282 (constant maximum vaccination rate) versus 4 781 individuals (optimal control on finite horizont). The effect with respect to the terminal behaviour of the approximate control may be unexpected on the first glance but is typical for optimal control problems which should be modelled on an infinite horizont but are truncated by a finite horizont; see [12], [11], [19], and [26]. This can be interpreted as devil-may-care solution.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For techniques to deal with infinite horizon optimal control problems we refer to[8],[12],[11], and[26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18,19]. It turns out that the transformed problem is not a classical optimal control problem with finite horizon, see [20], and a Pontryagin-type Maximum Principle remains hypothetical. In [19], a pseudospectral method was proposed as a direct approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%