2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State- and context-dependent applications of an energetics model in free-ranging bighorn sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that energy-saving mechanisms such as peripheral heterothermy depend on body condition, age and reproductive state. Overall, a strong seasonal pattern overshadowed relatively small intraseasonal responses in heart rate, emphasizing the importance of evaluating individual state and seasonal context when studying energetics in free-living animals [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that energy-saving mechanisms such as peripheral heterothermy depend on body condition, age and reproductive state. Overall, a strong seasonal pattern overshadowed relatively small intraseasonal responses in heart rate, emphasizing the importance of evaluating individual state and seasonal context when studying energetics in free-living animals [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was even greater in heavier females, suggesting that the cost of locomotion increases disproportionally with body mass and the intensity of activity [78]. Also, the reduced time spent active in winter is indicative of behavioural compensation to reduce energy deficits during periods of low food supply [79]. In summer, a higher proportion of time spent foraging [42] is likely to lead to a greater degree of rumen filling and, in turn, precipitate increased energy uptake and necessary increase in blood supply to the rumen [80] contributing to increased heart rates, even when resting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Spitz et al (2020) also observed that forage availability on both high and lowelevations ranges helped to explain the frequency of migrant and resident behaviors. They concluded that migrant SNBS prioritize access to forage at the cost of increased predation risk, while residents minimize predation risk but incur increased energetic costs imposed by limited access to forage and greater thermoregulatory demands (Johnson et al, 2013;Spitz et al, 2020;Denryter et al, 2021a). While our results suggest that avoidance of snow may be of greater importance for migrants than access to forage, discrepancies between studies may result from our quantification of vegetative biomass.…”
Section: Habitatmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…An alternative explanation for vacillating migration is that it represents seasonal habitat use or forays rather than a type of migration; however, high-and low-elevation ranges were separated by hundreds to thousands of meters in elevation (Appendix S1: Fig. S1B) and~4-12 km-distances that were~3-12 times greater than the high end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of daily movements of Sierra bighorn during winter (Denryter et al 2021). Regardless of whether vacillating migration is a true migratory behavior or seasonal habitat use, it differed significantly from other types of movement behavior in our study area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1B) and ~4–12 km—distances that were ~3–12 times greater than the high end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of daily movements of Sierra bighorn during winter (Denryter et al. 2021 ). Regardless of whether vacillating migration is a true migratory behavior or seasonal habitat use, it differed significantly from other types of movement behavior in our study area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%