2020
DOI: 10.46282/blr.2020.4.1.194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Aid Law as a passepartout: Shouldn’t We Stop Taking the Effect on Trade for Granted?

Abstract: The present contribution addresses the excessive amount of discretion left to the EU Commission (and Courts) in defining the enforcement priorities in the field of EU State aid Law, by singling out one element of the (inherently vague) the notion of State aid, namely the effect on trade between member States. The approach taken by the Commission’s practice and the ECJ case law in this field ends up building a rather unpredictable legal framework. This risks unreasonably undermining both member States’ legislat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the prohibition of aid granted by states (for more details regarding definitions and concepts of state aid see e.g. Cortese, 2020;Kubera, 2020;Pärn-Lee, 2020) is clearly stipulated in provision of Art. 107(1) TFEU: avoid any act of public authority that "distorts or threatens to distort competition […], in so far as it affects trade between Member States. "…”
Section: State Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the prohibition of aid granted by states (for more details regarding definitions and concepts of state aid see e.g. Cortese, 2020;Kubera, 2020;Pärn-Lee, 2020) is clearly stipulated in provision of Art. 107(1) TFEU: avoid any act of public authority that "distorts or threatens to distort competition […], in so far as it affects trade between Member States. "…”
Section: State Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%