2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STAT3 differential scanning fluorimetry and differential scanning light scattering assays: Addressing a missing link in the characterization of STAT3 inhibitor interactions

Abstract: STAT3 protein is an established target for the development of new cancer therapeutic agents. Despite lacking a traditional binding site for small molecule inhibitors, many STAT3 inhibitors have been identified and explored for their anti-cancer activity. Because STAT3 signaling is mediated by protein-protein interactions, indirect methods are often employed to determine if proposed STAT3 inhibitors bind to STAT3 protein. While established STAT3 inhibition assays (such as the fluorescence polarization assay, el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recombinant human mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit α (α-F1-ATP synthase) and β (β-F1-ATP synthase) were purchased from CusaBio (Houston, TX, USA). Binding of CADD522 to α or β subunit was examined experimentally using DSF, which evaluates changes in the target protein melting temperature (Tm) due to interactions with the test compound [ 64 , 114 , 115 ]. SYPRO orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted 1:1000 in 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.5), and 1.5 μM recombinant proteins were added to 96-well PCR plates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant human mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit α (α-F1-ATP synthase) and β (β-F1-ATP synthase) were purchased from CusaBio (Houston, TX, USA). Binding of CADD522 to α or β subunit was examined experimentally using DSF, which evaluates changes in the target protein melting temperature (Tm) due to interactions with the test compound [ 64 , 114 , 115 ]. SYPRO orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted 1:1000 in 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.5), and 1.5 μM recombinant proteins were added to 96-well PCR plates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band intensities were normalized to the sample containing 25 nM selenite, as this was the concentration used throughout this work to ensure adequate selenium supplementation. (12)]. These truncations were used because of difficulties producing and working with recombinant fulllength protein and to assess whether the compound was able to bind preferentially with the SH2 domain of STAT3, which is a primary target for many known STAT3 inhibitors (12).…”
Section: Small-molecule Inhibitors Of Stat3 Transcriptional Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12)]. These truncations were used because of difficulties producing and working with recombinant fulllength protein and to assess whether the compound was able to bind preferentially with the SH2 domain of STAT3, which is a primary target for many known STAT3 inhibitors (12). The resulting mixtures were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE), and the dansyltagged proteins could be detected under ultraviolet (UV) ex citation, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Small-molecule Inhibitors Of Stat3 Transcriptional Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their chemical structures vary, many of these compounds aim to bind the same site of STAT3, its Src Homology 2-domain (SH2-domain) [ 9 , 10 ]. Binding to the SH2 domain is believed to block STAT3 phosphorylation, dimerization and thereby its transcriptional function [ 11 , 12 ]. These small molecules were often confirmed to target STAT3 using biochemical assays, such as fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 10 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding to the SH2 domain is believed to block STAT3 phosphorylation, dimerization and thereby its transcriptional function [ 11 , 12 ]. These small molecules were often confirmed to target STAT3 using biochemical assays, such as fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 10 , 12 ]. Additional cellular and in vivo experiments have also typically been employed to demonstrate inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation, down-regulation of STAT3-dependent gene expression, or blockade of other STAT3-related cellular processes [ 9 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%