2021
DOI: 10.5195/jwsr.2021.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Starting a Dialogue: From Radical Criminology to Critical Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are reminded of how in the 1960s and 1970s anti-prison activism and scholarship was deeply connected to feminist, queer, Black, Latinx, and Red power movements. As Tony Platt has argued, political organizing and movement work was an integral part of the rise of radical criminology in the late 1960s and 1970s, as scholars and activists worked side by side on issues related to policing, prisons, and wider questions of state violence and created spaces that supported radical intellectual and political work which challenged mainstream social science approaches to social problems (Kurti, 2021). These efforts were quickly marginalized as radical social movements were criminalized by the state; criminology and criminal justice departments were institutionalized via state funding across universities (Kitossa and Tanyildiz, 2022; Schept et al, 2014); and the punitive turn gained wider legitimacy in American political life; all of which had profound implications for the transformation and reorganization of the American state as well as the capacity for intergenerational dialogue about the lessons learned.…”
Section: The George Floyd Rebellion and Abolitionist Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are reminded of how in the 1960s and 1970s anti-prison activism and scholarship was deeply connected to feminist, queer, Black, Latinx, and Red power movements. As Tony Platt has argued, political organizing and movement work was an integral part of the rise of radical criminology in the late 1960s and 1970s, as scholars and activists worked side by side on issues related to policing, prisons, and wider questions of state violence and created spaces that supported radical intellectual and political work which challenged mainstream social science approaches to social problems (Kurti, 2021). These efforts were quickly marginalized as radical social movements were criminalized by the state; criminology and criminal justice departments were institutionalized via state funding across universities (Kitossa and Tanyildiz, 2022; Schept et al, 2014); and the punitive turn gained wider legitimacy in American political life; all of which had profound implications for the transformation and reorganization of the American state as well as the capacity for intergenerational dialogue about the lessons learned.…”
Section: The George Floyd Rebellion and Abolitionist Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%