2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1158-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Start of vegetation growing season on the Tibetan Plateau inferred from multiple methods based on GIMMS and SPOT NDVI data

Abstract: Abstract:In this study, we have used four methods to investigate the start of the growing season (SGS) on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) from 1982 to 2012, using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data obtained from Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMSS, 1982(GIMSS, -2006 and SPOT VEGETATION (SPOT-VGT, 1999. SGS values estimated using the four methods show similar spatial patterns along latitudinal or altitudinal gradients, but with significant variations in the SGS dates. The largest disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…White et al [28] found that individual methods differed in average SOS by ±60 days, and the spatial phenological patterns derived from different methods often differed among ecoregions by comparing 10 commonly used methods for estimating the SOS based on the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) NDVI in North America. Such differences in phenology among methods were also found in other previous studies [33][34][35]. In our study, the differences between phenology derived from C5 and C6 NDVI varied among methods (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6-9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…White et al [28] found that individual methods differed in average SOS by ±60 days, and the spatial phenological patterns derived from different methods often differed among ecoregions by comparing 10 commonly used methods for estimating the SOS based on the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) NDVI in North America. Such differences in phenology among methods were also found in other previous studies [33][34][35]. In our study, the differences between phenology derived from C5 and C6 NDVI varied among methods (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6-9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although our results were consistent with those studies, our results could not fully capture cropland phenology, which is characterized by a second growing season in some areas of China. However, when we compared our results with those of Xiao et al [52], who based their conclusions on field observations, the trends in both SOS and EOS determined by the present study were the same as those identified by Xiao et al [52] for most stations. This suggests that even though some errors might be associated with remote-sensing data, the trend we inferred in crop phenology is still reliable.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution In Phenology Parameterssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The tree line ecotone ranges between 3000-4300 m altitude [85] and also has a good NDVI distribution. It can be said that the tree line area is experiencing good ecological restoration with more seedlings and saplings [86].The NDVI distribution and trends in different ecological zones indicate a good ecological status with a positive level of photosynthetic activities, biomass, productivity and ecosystem balance [19,23,87,88], as well as a lengthening of the growing season [89][90][91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%