2017
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201711895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stargazin and cornichon-3 relieve polyamine block of AMPA receptors by enhancing blocker permeation

Abstract: Polyamine block of AMPA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors is attenuated by auxiliary proteins stargazin and cornichon-3. Brown et al. show that relief from block is due to enhanced blocker permeation and present a modified model of permeant channel block to account for their experimental findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting the importance of the selectivity filter for anchoring polyamines in iGluR is the reduction of channel block by endogenous polyamines caused by substitutions in the filter (Panchenko et al, 2001; Wilding et al, 2010). Block by endogenous polyamines is attenuated by STZ and other TARPs, suggesting that the TARP-stabilized, maximally-conducting CP-AMPAR ion channel confirmation (Twomey et al, 2017a) allows for faster relief of trapped endogenous polyamines (Brown et al, 2018; Jackson et al, 2011; Soto et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting the importance of the selectivity filter for anchoring polyamines in iGluR is the reduction of channel block by endogenous polyamines caused by substitutions in the filter (Panchenko et al, 2001; Wilding et al, 2010). Block by endogenous polyamines is attenuated by STZ and other TARPs, suggesting that the TARP-stabilized, maximally-conducting CP-AMPAR ion channel confirmation (Twomey et al, 2017a) allows for faster relief of trapped endogenous polyamines (Brown et al, 2018; Jackson et al, 2011; Soto et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMPAR ion channel is lined by both M3 and M2, with the selectivity filter formed by the extended, nonhelical region of M2. Since the selectivity filter coordinates polyamines and polyamine toxin tails (Twomey et al, 2018), the TM4–M2 interactions could be the reason why TARPs increase polyamine permeation through AMPARs and attenuate polyamine block (Soto et al, 2007; Jackson et al, 2011; Brown et al, 2018). The AMPAR–TARP TMD interface, while overall similar, is unique per TARP subunit.…”
Section: Interfaces Between Ampars and Tarpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction with CNIHs also reduce CP-AMPARs desensitization and polyamine sensitivity. Resent findings suggest that both TARPs and CNIHs relieve channel block by enhancing the rate of blocker permeation ( Brown et al, 2018 ). Similarly, to type 1 TARPs and CNIHs, GSG1L slows deactivation and desensitization of CP-AMPARs ( Shanks et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Factors That Can Influence the Contribution Of Polyamine Depmentioning
confidence: 99%