1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0495(64)80018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Starch-gel electrophoresis—Application to the classification of pituitary proteins and polypeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
409
1
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 980 publications
(425 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
409
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For three protein standards and for all three polypeptides of citramalate lyase, linear Ferguson plots [33] intersecting at the same point (Ox acrylamide) were obtained (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Molecular Properties Of Citrumulute Lyasementioning
confidence: 82%
“…For three protein standards and for all three polypeptides of citramalate lyase, linear Ferguson plots [33] intersecting at the same point (Ox acrylamide) were obtained (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Molecular Properties Of Citrumulute Lyasementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The migration of the purified enzyme was analysed on a series of denaturing and native gels containing different polyacrylamide concentrations and the apparent size of the enzyme was determined by the method of Ferguson (1964). Under denaturing conditions the estimated molecular mass of CA is about 27 kDa while under native conditions the molecular mass is approximately 54 kDa, suggesting that the native enzyme is a dimer.…”
Section: Properties Of the Purified Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…by comparison to the mobility of cytochrome c. Ferguson plots of log10 R F against gel concentration for each protein gave straight lines which intersected at the same point when extrapolated to zero gel concentration, indicating that all the proteins, including the TGMV capsid polypeptide, migrated in a standard manner (Ferguson, 1964). The gradient of the Ferguson plots, called the retardation coefficient (KR), is a function of the protein size (Rodbard & Chrambach, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%