2024
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2020.0519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star Light, but Why Not So Bright? A Process Model of How Incumbents Influence Star Newcomer Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, managers should be wary of relying on the portability of the practice style of star performers recruited to a local work environment as they may not sustain their own practice style much less influence the practice style of their new peers (Boekhorst et al., 2022; Groysberg et al., 2008; Huckman & Pisano, 2006). Thus, managers should intervene during the imprinting stage when star performers are highly susceptible to peer influence by using various investiture socialization tactics to encourage newcomers to practice authentically (e.g., recognition of newcomer talent, skills, and capabilities) and insulate them from the pressure to adjust to the values and norms of the new work environment (Boekhorst et al., 2022; Dufour et al., 2021; Gowrisankaran et al., 2023, Groysberg et al., 2008; Huckman & Pisano, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, managers should be wary of relying on the portability of the practice style of star performers recruited to a local work environment as they may not sustain their own practice style much less influence the practice style of their new peers (Boekhorst et al., 2022; Groysberg et al., 2008; Huckman & Pisano, 2006). Thus, managers should intervene during the imprinting stage when star performers are highly susceptible to peer influence by using various investiture socialization tactics to encourage newcomers to practice authentically (e.g., recognition of newcomer talent, skills, and capabilities) and insulate them from the pressure to adjust to the values and norms of the new work environment (Boekhorst et al., 2022; Dufour et al., 2021; Gowrisankaran et al., 2023, Groysberg et al., 2008; Huckman & Pisano, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attribution process triggered by the changes of i-deal valence: variation in continuance or affective commitment When i-dealers perceive a change of i-deal valence, this change will likely trigger causal attributions by interpreting information about individuals involved and their surroundings (Heider, 1958). As attributions have high predictive power to explain workplace phenomena (Boekhorst et al, 2022), we adopt attribution theory to examine how the changes of i-deal valence would influence continuance or affective commitment through the attribution process. Attribution theory posits that employees are inclined to develop internal or external causal attributions for changes that occur in their work experiences (Heider, 1958;Weiner, 1985).…”
Section: Bjm 185mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When i-dealers perceive a change of i-deal valence, this change will likely trigger causal attributions by interpreting information about individuals involved and their surroundings (Heider, 1958). As attributions have high predictive power to explain workplace phenomena (Boekhorst et al. , 2022), we adopt attribution theory to examine how the changes of i-deal valence would influence continuance or affective commitment through the attribution process.…”
Section: Theories and Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation