2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498811004914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STAR-INVERTIBILITY AND t-FINITE CHARACTER IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

Abstract: Abstract. Let A be an integral domain. We study new conditions on families of integral ideals of A in order to get that A is of t-finite character (i.e., each nonzero element of A is contained in finitely many t-maximal ideals). We also investigate problems connected with the local invertibility of ideals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in [4], the authors introduced and studied the notion of a w-LPI domain; that is, an integral domain in which every nonzero w-locally principal ideal is w-invertible. (Relevant definitions and notations will be given in Section 1.2; and for more on w-LPI domains, the readers can refer to [5].) This is, the w-operation version of LPI domains.…”
Section: Motivations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in [4], the authors introduced and studied the notion of a w-LPI domain; that is, an integral domain in which every nonzero w-locally principal ideal is w-invertible. (Relevant definitions and notations will be given in Section 1.2; and for more on w-LPI domains, the readers can refer to [5].) This is, the w-operation version of LPI domains.…”
Section: Motivations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. Halter-Koch gave independently another proof in the more general context of ideal systems [71]. Other contributions were made by M. Zafrullah in [111] and by C. A. Finocchiaro, G. Picozza and F. Tartarone in [41]. Following D. D. Anderson and M. Zafrullah [7], an integral domain D is called an LPI-domain if each locally principal nonzero ideal of D is invertible.…”
Section: Problem 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use the fact that, for * of finite type, a Clifford * -regular domain has the * -local * -invertibility property (i.e., each ideal I such that I * R M is principal for all M ∈ * -Max(R) is * -invertible) [28,Lemma 4.4] and the following results from [19] (or from [13]). x ∈ R, any family of pairwise * -comaximal * -invertible * -ideals containing x is finite.…”
Section: The * -Finite Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%