2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star-forming clumps in the Lyman Alpha Reference Sample of galaxies – I. Photometric analysis and clumpiness

Abstract: We study young star-forming clumps on physical scales of 10 − 500 pc in the Lyman-Alpha Reference Sample (LARS), a collection of low-redshift (z = 0.03 − 0.2) UVselected star-forming galaxies. In each of the 14 galaxies of the sample, we detect clumps for which we derive sizes and magnitudes in 5 UV-optical filters. The final sample includes ∼ 1400 clumps, of which ∼ 600 have magnitude uncertainties below 0.3 in all filters. The UV luminosity function for the total sample of clumps is described by a power-law … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing galactic distance the approximation of having a single cluster within the compact source becomes weaker and weaker (Randriamanakoto et al 2013) and eventually even the approximation of single stellar population fails. At distance beyond 80 Mpc starforming regions with the size of 30 Doradus become unresolved, we enter the domain of the so-called stellar clumps (e.g., Messa et al 2019) studied up to redshift z ∼ 6 (e.g., Shibuya et al 2016).…”
Section: Observational Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing galactic distance the approximation of having a single cluster within the compact source becomes weaker and weaker (Randriamanakoto et al 2013) and eventually even the approximation of single stellar population fails. At distance beyond 80 Mpc starforming regions with the size of 30 Doradus become unresolved, we enter the domain of the so-called stellar clumps (e.g., Messa et al 2019) studied up to redshift z ∼ 6 (e.g., Shibuya et al 2016).…”
Section: Observational Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect evidence of proto-GCs formation at high redshift is produced by the physical properties of stellar clumps. Stellar clumps dominate the UV rest-frame of their host systems (e.g., Elmegreen et al 2013;Shibuya et al 2016;Messa et al 2019) and have very high SRF surface densities, making them a natural sight for very massive cluster formation (Elmegreen 2018). Indeed, assuming that proto-GCs form in stellar clumps following a Schechter mass function distribution and accounting for cluster disruption, it produces a first order calculation of the surving GC populations at redshift z = 0 that are comparable to the number and mass functions of the GCs detected around galaxies like the Milky Way and M31 (e.g., Shapiro et al 2010;Adamo et al 2013).…”
Section: Current and Future Observations And Simulations Of Massive Cluster Formation Across Cosmic Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lyman Alpha Reference Sample (LARS; Östlin et al 2014) provides a unique and complete z ∼ 0 benchmark sample of different galaxies displaying diverse Lyα properties, studied across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the UV to the 21 cm line, including Hα imaging and spectroscopy. Despite the large amount of information available, the authors identified many factors that can affect Lyα emission, however, such as dust, outflows, morphology, turbulence, and clumpiness of the ISM (Hayes 2015;Herenz et al 2016;Guaita et al 2015;Messa et al 2019). A recent multivariate analysis of the low-z dataset (Runnholm et al 2020) indicates that Lyα emission primarily correlates with the star formation rate (SFR; which sets the absolute scale), and then with the reddening of the stellar continuum E(B − V) * and the gas-covering fraction in decreasing order, with both governing the Lyα escape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clumps have been detected in rest-frame UV imaging (e.g. Guo et al 2012Guo et al , 2015Guo et al , 2018Livermore et al 2012;Shibuya et al 2016;Soto et al 2017;Dessauges-Zavadsky & Adamo 2018;Messa et al 2019;Vanzella et al 2021) as well as in maps of Balmer (e.g. Hα, Hβ, see Livermore et al 2012;Mieda et al 2016;Fisher et al 2017;Zanella et al 2019;Whitmore et al 2020) and Paschen (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%