2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation is boosted (and quenched) from the inside-out: radial star formation profiles from MaNGA

Abstract: The tight correlation between total galaxy stellar mass and star formation rate (SFR) has become known as the star forming main sequence. Using ∼ 487,000 spaxels from galaxies observed as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Mapping Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey, we confirm previous results that a correlation also exists between the surface densities of star formation (Σ SFR ) and stellar mass (Σ ) on kpc scales, representing a 'resolved' main sequence. Using a new metric (∆Σ SFR ), which… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

36
182
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(248 reference statements)
36
182
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual Pipe3D implementation adopts the GSD156 stellar library, that comprises 39 ages (from 1 Myr to 14 Gyr) and four metallicities (from 0.2 to 1.6 Z ), extensively described in Cid Fernandes et al (2013), and used in previous studies (e.g. Ibarra-Medel et al 2016;Ellison et al Figure 4. An example of the results of the fitting procedure to recover the best model of the stellar population and emission lines applied to a spectrum extracted from a galaxy within our compilation, NGC 1762, shifted to the rest frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual Pipe3D implementation adopts the GSD156 stellar library, that comprises 39 ages (from 1 Myr to 14 Gyr) and four metallicities (from 0.2 to 1.6 Z ), extensively described in Cid Fernandes et al (2013), and used in previous studies (e.g. Ibarra-Medel et al 2016;Ellison et al Figure 4. An example of the results of the fitting procedure to recover the best model of the stellar population and emission lines applied to a spectrum extracted from a galaxy within our compilation, NGC 1762, shifted to the rest frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as looking at the role of bulges in regulating the shape of the SFMS, many studies have also studied how the position of a galaxy across the SFMS relates to the growth of their central component. Morselli et al (2017); Popesso et al (2019a) find that the average B/T of galaxies increases both above and below the SFMS and is suggested to correspond to a central enhancement of star formation activity observed in starburst galaxies (Morselli et al 2019;Belfiore et al 2018;Ellison et al 2018). These observations have pointed towards a possible scenario in which star-forming galaxies may oscillate about the SFMS due to successive compaction events followed by depletion of their cold gas reservoirs (Zolotov et al 2015;Tacchella et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Such turnover also indicates the inside-out quenching of galaxies. The quenching process is beyond the scope of the present paper, but is of major importance in the context of galaxy evolution (e.g., Li et al 2015;González Delgado et al 2016;Belfiore et al 2017;Lin et al 2017;Spindler et al 2017;Ellison et al 2018).…”
Section: Spatially Resolved Hα-m * Relation Using All Spaxels In Galamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using spatially resolved spectroscopy, recent studies have shown that there also exist a tight correlation between SFR and stellar mass surface density for nearby and distant star-forming galaxies (Nelson et al 2012;Wuyts et al 2013;Cano-Díaz et al 2016;Abdurro'uf & Akiyama 2017;Hsieh et al 2017;Ellison et al 2018). Recently, Hsieh et al (2017) extended the study to the quiescent population using the MaNGA survey (Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO; Bundy et al 2015) and found that the emission line fluxes, even classified as LI(N)ER, 14 are also correlated with the underlying stellar mass surface density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%