2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08942.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation in unbound giant molecular clouds: the origin of OB associations?

Abstract: We investigate the formation of star clusters in an unbound giant molecular cloud, where the supporting kinetic energy is twice as large as the cloud's self‐gravity. This cloud manages to form a series of star clusters and disperse, all within roughly two crossing times (10 Myr), supporting recent claims that star formation is a rapid process. Simple assumptions about the nature of the star formation occurring in the clusters allows us to place an estimate for the star formation efficiency at about 5–10 per ce… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
109
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(93 reference statements)
12
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we cannot rule out that some clouds may also be completely destroyed, e.g., in the manner described in the previous section; mass loss might follow from shear, which is non-zero at these radii, or through the process of star formation itself, which might consume a large fraction of the cloud mass. In some models, the star formation efficiency per free-fall time can be as high as 0.2-0.3 (e.g., Klessen & Burkert 2000;Bonnell et al 2003;Vazquez-Semadeni et al 2003;Clark et al 2005). …”
Section: Transformation Via Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we cannot rule out that some clouds may also be completely destroyed, e.g., in the manner described in the previous section; mass loss might follow from shear, which is non-zero at these radii, or through the process of star formation itself, which might consume a large fraction of the cloud mass. In some models, the star formation efficiency per free-fall time can be as high as 0.2-0.3 (e.g., Klessen & Burkert 2000;Bonnell et al 2003;Vazquez-Semadeni et al 2003;Clark et al 2005). …”
Section: Transformation Via Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger mass clouds which formed in more turbulent conditions, are more resistant to the disruptive effects of young stars, i.e., can sustain a higher star-forming efficiency. Clark et al (2005) investigated the formation of star clusters in unbound giant molecular clouds (GMCs), where the cloud tend to form a series of star clusters and disperse quickly, within a rapid star formation process (∼10Myr). They also proposed that the clusters that form in the unbound GMCs may be progenitors of the OB associations.…”
Section: Possible Formation Scenarios Of the Yscs In Arp 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 5-10 Myr, 90% of the embedded clusters do not evolve to become bound open clusters, like the Pleiades, but rather disperse into the field (Lada & Lada 2003). This happens because the cluster forms in an unbound state or becomes unbound during a ∼10 Myr timeframe from the dynamical evolution of stars within the cluster (Clark et al 2005;Carpenter 2000;Adams & Myers 2001;Lada & Lada 2003), because of the expulsion of residual gas left over from star formation (e.g., Hills 1980;Lada et al 1984;, because of the tidal heating from nearby giant molecular clouds (Elmegreenalso affects planet formation because of frequent stellar encounters in crowded regions (e.g., Adams & Laughlin 2001;Parker & Quanz 2012), stellar multiplicity through dynamical interactions and the orbital separation distribution of binary systems , and mass segregation towards the cluster core (Parker & Reggiani 2013). A detailed study of dynamical states of clusters in a variety of environments is needed in order to understand the evolution of stellar clusters and the relative importance of these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%