1982
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1982-0654856-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star-finite representations of measure spaces

Abstract: Abstract. In nonstandard analysis, "-finite sets are infinite sets which nonetheless possess the formal properties of finite sets. They permit a synthesis of continuous and discrete theories in many areas of mathematics, including probability theory, functional analysis, and mathematical economics, "-finite models are particularly useful in building new models of economic or probabilistic processes.It is natural to ask what standard models can be obtained from these '-finite models. In this paper, we show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sequence of measurable mappings from a measure space to a topological space is tight if for any Ͼ 0, there exists a compact set containing more than (1 Ϫ ) of the mass of the measure induced by each mapping. The tightness hypothesis guarantees that the standard part map (14,(16)(17)(18)24) is well-defined and Loeb measurable, thereby furnishing the measurability hypothesis in Corollary 1. We can now present, in the notation of Corollary 1, our next result.…”
Section: With (Z L(ᐆ) L()) Its Loeb Standardization; and (Iii) A Pamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A sequence of measurable mappings from a measure space to a topological space is tight if for any Ͼ 0, there exists a compact set containing more than (1 Ϫ ) of the mass of the measure induced by each mapping. The tightness hypothesis guarantees that the standard part map (14,(16)(17)(18)24) is well-defined and Loeb measurable, thereby furnishing the measurability hypothesis in Corollary 1. We can now present, in the notation of Corollary 1, our next result.…”
Section: With (Z L(ᐆ) L()) Its Loeb Standardization; and (Iii) A Pamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…)zC(K,,,R) and so, using Anderson's Luzin theorem [2] applied to the measurable function fk: [0, ~) ~ C(Km, R), we see that for a.a. finite z °Fdz, U) =fd°r, °U) for all U with IIUII < oo. )zC(K,,,R) and so, using Anderson's Luzin theorem [2] applied to the measurable function fk: [0, ~) ~ C(Km, R), we see that for a.a. finite z °Fdz, U) =fd°r, °U) for all U with IIUII < oo.…”
Section: Bochner Integration and Applications To Navier-stokes Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The stochastic integral ~g dw is defined in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Note that if we write Wk(t) = (w(t), ek) and wtm~(t) = ~ w~(t)e~, k=l then w t~) is a Wiener process with covariance Q., = Pr,.Q Pr,. and fo fo…”
Section: Standard Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By Theorem 3.8 in[2] dora(G) is then #-measurable. As in the proof of Proposition 3.1 the *Y-sections of the graph st-l(G) are II~ sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%