2010
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.011429-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole (Microtus arvalis)

Abstract: Two strains of Gram-positive cocci were isolated from viscera of common voles (Microtus arvalis Pallas) with generalized Brucella microti infection in the Czech Republic. Biochemical features and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the strains are representatives of the genus Staphylococcus and assigned Staphylococcus muscae as the nearest relative. A detailed characterization done by ribotyping, rpoB and hsp60 gene sequencing, whole-cell protein analysis and rep-PCR using the (G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the identification kits used gave inconsistent results regarding the Voges-Proskauer test, with a positive reaction on API STAPH and negative one on ID 32 STAPH. To resolve this discrepancy and to address some differences between our results and those obtained by other investigators (Nováková et al, 2010;Riesen and Perreten, 2010), several phenotypic tests (for acetoin production, mannose fermentation and esculin hydrolysis) were also carried out using conventional methods. Our isolates tested negative in all these reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the identification kits used gave inconsistent results regarding the Voges-Proskauer test, with a positive reaction on API STAPH and negative one on ID 32 STAPH. To resolve this discrepancy and to address some differences between our results and those obtained by other investigators (Nováková et al, 2010;Riesen and Perreten, 2010), several phenotypic tests (for acetoin production, mannose fermentation and esculin hydrolysis) were also carried out using conventional methods. Our isolates tested negative in all these reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Our isolates gave a positive reaction on the API STAPH strip and negative one on ID 32 STAPH and in the tube method. Given the reported weak reaction of S. microti for acetoin (Nováková et al, 2010), this phenomenon may have been associated with a different sensitivity of the identification systems used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations