The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1988
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-38-2-168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus lugdunensis sp. nov. and Staphylococcus schleiferi sp. nov., Two Species from Human Clinical Specimens

Abstract: Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness studies (S1 nuclease method) showed that 23 unidentified Staphylococcus strains form two homogeneous genomic species related 1 to 9% to 24 type strains representing known Staphylococcus species. These new species were named Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus schleiferi. Strains of S . lugdunensis were susceptible to novobiocin, produced a fibrinogen affinity factor, and failed to produce coagulase, heat-stable nuclease, and staphylokinase. S . lugdunensis strains di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

12
236
0
14

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
236
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirteen reference strains were used: Staphylococcus caprae (DSM 20608) (Kawamura et al, 1998); Staphylococcus cohnii (DSM 20260), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (DSM 20263), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (DSM 20229) and Staphylococcus xylosus (DSM 20267) ; Staphylococcus hominis (DSM 20328), Staphylococcus simulans (DSM 20322) and Staphylococcus warneri (DSM 20316) ; Staphylococcus epidermidis (DSM 1798) (Winslow, 1908); Staphylococcus hyicus (DSM 20459) (Schleifer & Kocur, 1973); Staphylococcus intermedius (DSM 20373) (Hajek, 1976); and Staphylococcus lugdunensis (DSM 4804) and Staphylococcus schleiferi (DSM 4807) (Freney et al, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen reference strains were used: Staphylococcus caprae (DSM 20608) (Kawamura et al, 1998); Staphylococcus cohnii (DSM 20260), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (DSM 20263), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (DSM 20229) and Staphylococcus xylosus (DSM 20267) ; Staphylococcus hominis (DSM 20328), Staphylococcus simulans (DSM 20322) and Staphylococcus warneri (DSM 20316) ; Staphylococcus epidermidis (DSM 1798) (Winslow, 1908); Staphylococcus hyicus (DSM 20459) (Schleifer & Kocur, 1973); Staphylococcus intermedius (DSM 20373) (Hajek, 1976); and Staphylococcus lugdunensis (DSM 4804) and Staphylococcus schleiferi (DSM 4807) (Freney et al, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study shows a defect in the bactericidal activity of glycopeptides against CoNS of the S. lugdunensis species. Since its description in 1988 (8), this species, shown to be part of the normal skin flora, has been described as being one of the most pathogenic CoNS (9). Indeed, S. lugdunensis infections resemble S. aureus infections (9) in terms of virulence, tissue destruction, and clinical course, particularly for endocarditis (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type strain of this species is strain MB4 (= CCM 4175). (5,11,21,26). Most of the new species were isolated from animals; the exceptions were S .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 28 species are currently recognized in the genus Staphylococcus; 19 species are listed in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (14), two species (Staphylococcus chromogenes and Staphylococcus lentus) have been elevated from the subspecies level (8, 19), and 7 species have been described since 1984 (Staphylococcus arlettae, Staphylococcus delphini, Staphylococcus equorum, Staphylococcus felis, Staphylococcus kloosii, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Staphylococcus schleiferi) (5,11,21,26). Most of the new species were isolated from animals; the exceptions were S .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%