2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4252-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcal Phage 2638A endolysin is lytic for Staphylococcus aureus and harbors an inter-lytic-domain secondary translational start site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). The 9 candidates are listed in Table 1 and include (besides lysostaphin) the constructs CHAPK_CWT-LST, a fusion protein consisting of the CHAP endopeptidase domain of the phage endolysin LysK (23,24) and the SH3b-type cell wall targeting domain (CWT) of lysostaphin; Ami2638A, a truncation construct harboring the amidase domain of the 2638A endolysin (25); CHAPK_CBD2638A, a fusion of the LysK CHAP domain with the SH3b CBD of the 2638A endolysin; M23LST_CBD2638A, a fusion of the M23 endopeptidase domain of lysostaphin and the CBD of 2638A; CHAPK_CHAPK_CWT-LST, a construct containing the duplicated CHAP domain of LysK fused to the CWT of lysostaphin; M23LST_CHAPH5_CWT-LST, a fusion protein featuring an N-terminal M23 domain of lysostaphin, a centrally located CHAP domain from LysH5 (an endolysin reportedly active in cow's milk) (26), and a C-terminal CWT of lysostaphin; CHAPH5_LST, which includes the CHAP domain of LysH5 fused to lysostaphin; and CHAPTwort, a truncation construct consisting of the CHAP domain of the phage Twort endolysin (27). Of note, this selection of 9 PGH constructs comprises enzymes with diverse domain architectures, ranging from single EADs without a cell wall binding module to chimeric multidomain fusion proteins, and includes EADs targeting multiple PG cleavage sites (amidase, CHAP endopeptidases, and lysostaphin M23 endopeptidase).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). The 9 candidates are listed in Table 1 and include (besides lysostaphin) the constructs CHAPK_CWT-LST, a fusion protein consisting of the CHAP endopeptidase domain of the phage endolysin LysK (23,24) and the SH3b-type cell wall targeting domain (CWT) of lysostaphin; Ami2638A, a truncation construct harboring the amidase domain of the 2638A endolysin (25); CHAPK_CBD2638A, a fusion of the LysK CHAP domain with the SH3b CBD of the 2638A endolysin; M23LST_CBD2638A, a fusion of the M23 endopeptidase domain of lysostaphin and the CBD of 2638A; CHAPK_CHAPK_CWT-LST, a construct containing the duplicated CHAP domain of LysK fused to the CWT of lysostaphin; M23LST_CHAPH5_CWT-LST, a fusion protein featuring an N-terminal M23 domain of lysostaphin, a centrally located CHAP domain from LysH5 (an endolysin reportedly active in cow's milk) (26), and a C-terminal CWT of lysostaphin; CHAPH5_LST, which includes the CHAP domain of LysH5 fused to lysostaphin; and CHAPTwort, a truncation construct consisting of the CHAP domain of the phage Twort endolysin (27). Of note, this selection of 9 PGH constructs comprises enzymes with diverse domain architectures, ranging from single EADs without a cell wall binding module to chimeric multidomain fusion proteins, and includes EADs targeting multiple PG cleavage sites (amidase, CHAP endopeptidases, and lysostaphin M23 endopeptidase).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exception seems to be the endolysin of the staphylococcal phage 2638A, which has been described as having an Nterminal M23 peptidase domain, a central amidase CD and a C-terminal SH3b CWB domain. Interestingly, in the assayed conditions, the amidase CD of this endolysin was shown to contribute to most of the enzyme's lytic activity (Abaev et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables such as the density of the cell suspension, bacterial strain, growth phase, buffer formulation, assay temperature, and enzyme concentration can profoundly influence results. Nonetheless, the kinetics of GAGS and LytLys are seemingly on par with or exceed that of many top-performing lysins, including λSa2 (Becker et al , 2009), 2638A (Abaev et al , 2013), and LysK (Becker et al , 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%