2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30125-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stapes surgery in residency - the ufpr clinical hospital experience

Abstract: Postoperative hearing gains considered as surgical success were inferior to published results in the literature, done by experienced surgeons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 68.4% of the patients achieved a postoperative gap less than or equal to 10 dB. This result is in agreement with other studies conducted in training centers in which the surgical success ranged from 48% to 87% [6][7][8][9][10][11] . An accurate comparison between studies is difficult and was not our goal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, 68.4% of the patients achieved a postoperative gap less than or equal to 10 dB. This result is in agreement with other studies conducted in training centers in which the surgical success ranged from 48% to 87% [6][7][8][9][10][11] . An accurate comparison between studies is difficult and was not our goal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies in training institutions present this high discrepancy. Vernick 6 reported 13%, Freitas et al 7 obtained 15.8%, and Caldart et al 9 found a difference of 24.56%. This disparity in closure could be inconsequential to technical problems related to the level of experience of the surgeon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2 Furthermore, despite the high overall rate of positive outcomes, there remains a risk for complications, including total irreversible sensorineural hearing loss. 3,4 As such, stapes surgery is one of the most litigated procedures within neurotology, with successful claims resulting in the second-highest mean payment per claim within the subspecialty at $2,733,000. 5 Complicating matters further is the decreasing volume of these procedures and the limited availability of high-fidelity, low-cost models to adequately facilitate resident/fellow training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%