2002
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2002.1160083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stanford interactive workspaces: a framework for physical and graphical user interface prototyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An early project was the Stanford iRoom [10], an infrastructure that enabled the devices in a room to communicate with each other. Lucia Terrenghi and colleagues provided a comprehensive taxonomy of different scales of multisurface environments [11], from wristwatches and phones to the side of a building.…”
Section: Sidebar: Recommended Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early project was the Stanford iRoom [10], an infrastructure that enabled the devices in a room to communicate with each other. Lucia Terrenghi and colleagues provided a comprehensive taxonomy of different scales of multisurface environments [11], from wristwatches and phones to the side of a building.…”
Section: Sidebar: Recommended Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stanford Interactive Workspaces project tackled this problem by developing a robust, fault-tolerant middleware that built on the concept of the Event Heap, a tuplespace with publish-subscribe semantics (see [Borchers, Ringel, Tyler and Fox 2002] or Winograd's chapter for details). It allowed applications to send or subscribe to particular events, enabling applications, devices and services to talk to each other.…”
Section: ♦♦♦mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one point, we created a "Start the Room" button using our iStuff toolkit [Borchers, Ringel, Tyler and Fox 2002] that could simply be tacked to a wall near the entrance and would complete this setup procedure when pressed.…”
Section: ♦♦♦mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, DC may be viewed as a novel way of exploiting a relational approach [Ullmer & Ishii 2000] to Tangible User Interface design, systematically allowing the selection of multiple objects to determine dynamically bindings between objects and computational operations. Other systems with related goals, but different approaches include Recombinant Computing , and the iRoom tuple-space approach [Borchers et al 2002]. DC relates strongly to Direct Manipulation (DM): parts of DC may be viewed as generalizations or specializations of DM, though the relationship is complex.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%