2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4833795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing waves for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with decaying potentials

Abstract: We study the following singularly perturbed problem for a coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system which arises in Bose-Einstein condensate:Here, a, b are nonnegative continuous potentials, and µ 1 , µ 2 > 0. We consider the case where the coupling constant β > 0 is relatively large. Then for sufficiently small ε > 0, we obtain positive solutions of this system which concentrate around local minima of the potentials as ε → 0. The novelty is that the potentials a and b may vanish at someplace and decay to 0 at infi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our existence of positive ground state result in Theorem 1.2 is different from the one in [27] from several aspects. The result in [27] imposes weaker conditions on P , Q outside of open subset and considers positive ground state solutions concentrating near x 0 ∈ where the ground state energy m(x 0 ) for (1.3) with (λ 1 , λ 2 ) = (P (x 0 ), Q(x 0 )) achieves the minimum (see (1.7) and (1.8)).…”
Section: )contrasting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our existence of positive ground state result in Theorem 1.2 is different from the one in [27] from several aspects. The result in [27] imposes weaker conditions on P , Q outside of open subset and considers positive ground state solutions concentrating near x 0 ∈ where the ground state energy m(x 0 ) for (1.3) with (λ 1 , λ 2 ) = (P (x 0 ), Q(x 0 )) achieves the minimum (see (1.7) and (1.8)).…”
Section: )contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Our result considers positive ground state solutions concentrating near global minima points of P and Q (which necessarily achieves minimal m(x 0 )) but with simplified conditions on P , Q as m(x 0 ) in (1.7) cannot be explicitly expressed. Our result holds for 1 ≤ N ≤ 3 and the one in [27] is only for N = 3 as they used Hardy inequality for the proof. Our condition (1.9) on β reveals the dependence on the spatial dimension N , and it is almost optimal compared with earlier result for autonomous system (see Theorem 1.1 and [23]).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations