2015
DOI: 10.5406/femteacher.26.1.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing Up and Standing Together: Feminist Teaching and Collaborative Mentoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, we agree with Lisa A. Costello (2015) that campus actors must work to change how "chairs, deans, and provosts . .…”
Section: Recommendations: Revising Writing Mentorshipmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For that reason, we agree with Lisa A. Costello (2015) that campus actors must work to change how "chairs, deans, and provosts . .…”
Section: Recommendations: Revising Writing Mentorshipmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Overall, 58% (52/89) of verbal data segments coded Mentoring were Negative (36/63 or 57% of doctoral student segments; and 16/26 or approximately 62% of faculty segments). The prevalence of negative experiences associated with mentoring concerns is significant given the important role that mentoring is known to play in supporting advanced writers' development and academic socialization (Casanave, 2016;Costello, 2015;Cox & Brunjes, 2013;Kim, 2016;Maher & Say, 2016;Morita, 2004;Simpson, 2016;Simpson, Ruecker et al, 2016;Stillman-Webb, 2016 We used evaluation coding (Saldaña, 2016) to document the many different experiences reported in relation to Negative Mentoring and Negative Structure. Often used to assess programs or organizations, evaluation coding involves locating "patterned observations or participant responses of attributes and details that assess quality."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 58% (52/89) of verbal data segments coded Mentoring were Negative (36/63 or 57% of doctoral student segments; and 16/26 or approximately 62% of faculty segments). The prevalence of negative experiences associated with mentoring concerns is significant given the important role that mentoring is known to play in supporting advanced writers' development and academic socialization (Casanave, 2016;Costello, 2015;Cox & Brunjes, 2013;Kim, 2016;Maher & Say, 2016;Morita, 2004;Simpson, 2016;Simpson, Ruecker et al, 2016;Stillman-Webb, 2016). At the same time, approximately 68% of segments coded Structure were Negative (135/200 total; 69/118 or approximately 58% of doctoral student Structure codes and 66/80 or approximately 83% of faculty Structure codes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 58% (52/89) of verbal data segments coded Mentoring were Negative (36/63 or 57% of doctoral student segments; and 16/26 or approximately 62% of faculty segments). The prevalence of negative experiences associated with mentoring concerns is significant given the important role that mentoring is known to play in supporting advanced writers' development and academic socialization (Casanave, 2016;Costello, 2015;Cox & Brunjes, 2013;Kim, 2016;Maher & Say, 2016;Morita, 2004;Simpson, 2016;Simpson, Ruecker et al, 2016;Stillman-Webb, 2016). At the same time, approximately 68% of segments coded Structure were Negative (135/200 total; 69/118 or approximately 58% of doctoral student Structure codes and 66/80 or approximately 83% of faculty Structure codes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%