2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84899-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing on unstable surface challenges postural control of tracking tasks and modulates neuromuscular adjustments specific to task complexity

Abstract: Understanding the modulations of motor control in the presence of perturbations in task conditions of varying complexity is a key element towards the design of effective perturbation-based balance exercise programs. In this study we investigated the effect of mechanical perturbations, induced by an unstable surface, on muscle activation and visuo-postural coupling, when actively tracking target motion cues of different complexity. Four postural tasks following a visual oscillating target of varying target comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings shed further light on the effect of vision and support surfaces (175) and of adaptation on the control of stance based on the analysis of geometric and spectral measures. The large variation in these measures due to individual characteristics (e.g., visual and kinaesthetic dependence, (176,177), muscle, (178), control strategies (27,58), age (179) asks for a parallel examination of different markers before firm conclusions can be drawn from the findings.…”
Section: The Rqs Have Largely Different Values Between Foam Andmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The findings shed further light on the effect of vision and support surfaces (175) and of adaptation on the control of stance based on the analysis of geometric and spectral measures. The large variation in these measures due to individual characteristics (e.g., visual and kinaesthetic dependence, (176,177), muscle, (178), control strategies (27,58), age (179) asks for a parallel examination of different markers before firm conclusions can be drawn from the findings.…”
Section: The Rqs Have Largely Different Values Between Foam Andmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The role of proprioception can be more important when the balance is challenged (48) without vision. Under perturbed conditions or with a major reduction of the support surface (49,50), when the postural muscle activity plays a major stabilising role, the role of proprioception is amplified and that of vision becomes of minor importance (51,52). Moreover, velocity information would be crucial to stabilise posture during standing on foam support, where the task difficulty is increased and balance is controlled by many muscles acting at several joints (49,(53)(54)(55)(56)(57).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If anything, it might be crudely schematised that standing on the complaint surface exploits a powerful input along the Ia fibers, while standing on the hard surface favors group II fiber activity ( 124 127 ). Hence, both spindle afferent inputs from the muscles of the foot ( 116 ) and of those around the ankle would contribute their information to a common feedback control of stance on hard and compliant surface ( 17 , 128 , 129 ). Of course, these inputs would not be the same under both support surface conditions ( 130 ), and the reasonable conclusion is that standing on a compliant or on a hard surface are two different tasks with a common task goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%