Standards for Instructional 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781315855301-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards for Supervision of Curriculum Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first iteration of the CPCQ, teacher interns were asked to tally up the sum of the ratings in each column that represented each level of the Continuum. I replicated this process from Badiali’s (2005) q-sort, as previously described, but found via observations, critical friends, and teacher interns that there was no need to have participants tally their scores. Specifically, I found that the tallying process detracted from the initial aims of the CPCQ, which was to assess PSTs’ cultural competence via a dialogic process.…”
Section: Methodology (With Embedded Findings)mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the first iteration of the CPCQ, teacher interns were asked to tally up the sum of the ratings in each column that represented each level of the Continuum. I replicated this process from Badiali’s (2005) q-sort, as previously described, but found via observations, critical friends, and teacher interns that there was no need to have participants tally their scores. Specifically, I found that the tallying process detracted from the initial aims of the CPCQ, which was to assess PSTs’ cultural competence via a dialogic process.…”
Section: Methodology (With Embedded Findings)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Educational Philosophy Q-Sort* (see Badiali, 2005) was used as a structure to guide the backward design of the CPCQ. Q is a process by which respondents are forced to rank/sort ideas that illuminated their subjectivities about a given topic (e.g., teaching beliefs or practice; Prasad, 2001; Stephenson, 1935).…”
Section: Methodology (With Embedded Findings)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All interviews were conducted in the teachers' schools and after the second classroom visit had taken place for each teacher. The interviews started with the Curriculum Platform Q-sort (Badiali, 2005; Appendix D). The Curriculum Platform Q-sort asked the participants to order various statements in four groups (aims of education, nature of knowledge, teacher's role, and curriculum purpose) according to their beliefs.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher focuses on relevance of knowledge by connecting science to students' own experiences and perceptions of the natural world, rather than presenting it in isolation. `rithmetic) and major content areas (English, science, math, history, foreign language) D. ---Curriculum centers on examining social, economic, and political problems, from present/ future, national/international perspectives E. ---Curriculum centers on student interests; involves the application of human problems; subject matter is interdisciplinary Scoring guide for curriculum philosophy Q-sort (Badiali, 2005) When you have completed the Q-sort exercise, go back and look at each category. Place the number that you assigned to each statement in the space provided in the following rubric.…”
Section: D2: Instructional Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%