1993
DOI: 10.5558/tfc69438-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same was done for h residuals by relative diameters. These graphs, calculated by position, are very important for showing areas for which the taper functions provide especially poor or good predictions (Kozak, 2004;Kozak and Smith, 1993).…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same was done for h residuals by relative diameters. These graphs, calculated by position, are very important for showing areas for which the taper functions provide especially poor or good predictions (Kozak, 2004;Kozak and Smith, 1993).…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same was done for volume residuals by diameter classes. These graphs, assessed by class for relative height or diameter at breast height, are very important for visualizing areas or tree size classes for which the functions provide especially good or especially poor predictions (Kozak & Smith, 1993). …”
Section: Model Comparison and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) when using the actual upper diameter measurement at 5.30 m. A lower bias does not guarantee good model performance, since large positive and negative values may algebraically counterbalance. Since it indicates the spread of the biases (residuals), the overall standard error of estimate is a better single indicator of goodness of fit (Kozak & Smith 1993). The additions of linear functions of CR and CR with CL improved model performance by reducing SEE by 1.18-3.28 % and 1.39-2.78 % for diameter and volume estimation, respectively.…”
Section: Approximation Through Taper and Volume Equations Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%