2002
DOI: 10.1002/tea.10012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards‐based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools

Abstract: This conceptual article examines the in¯uence of the current standards-based reform upon science education policies and practices within urban schools. We identify four negative yet unforeseen effects of the reform movement: undermining urban teachers' professionalism, eroding teacher±student relationships, diluting the science curriculum, and disparate instruction based on predicted individual test performance. Our awareness of these nuisances emerged from our ®rst-hand engagement with urban science teaching … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, instructional time for science in lowperforming urban elementary schools is often limited and tightly regulated due to the urgency of developing basic literacy and numeracy in students with limited literacy and numeracy skills and those learning English as a new language. Furthermore, teachers wishing to pursue inquiry instruction in urban schools face added challenges in the context of high-stakes assessment and accountability, as sanctions against poor academic performance are disproportionately leveled against urban schools (Secada & Lee, 2003;Settlage & Meadows, 2002;Wideen, O'Shea, Pye, & Ivany, 1997).…”
Section: Science Inquiry Instruction With Ell and Low-ses Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, instructional time for science in lowperforming urban elementary schools is often limited and tightly regulated due to the urgency of developing basic literacy and numeracy in students with limited literacy and numeracy skills and those learning English as a new language. Furthermore, teachers wishing to pursue inquiry instruction in urban schools face added challenges in the context of high-stakes assessment and accountability, as sanctions against poor academic performance are disproportionately leveled against urban schools (Secada & Lee, 2003;Settlage & Meadows, 2002;Wideen, O'Shea, Pye, & Ivany, 1997).…”
Section: Science Inquiry Instruction With Ell and Low-ses Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as an intervention is scaled up, it should address the demands of high-stakes testing and accountability in its specific policy context (Marx & Harris, 2006;Settlage & Meadows, 2002;Southerland, Smith, Sowell, & Kittleson, 2007). This is because schools and districts place an increasing amount of trust in the intervention as it goes to scale.…”
Section: Challenges In Scale-up Of Educational Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban students are less likely to have access to rich, inquiry-based learning experiences which is especially true when classrooms, like many urban classrooms, have insufficient access to resources including equipment, a lack of challenging and meaningful curriculum, and a lack of opportunity to develop a sense of community especially with one's teachers (National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine 2004). Urban education tends to focus on control over individual expression, behavior over understanding, and passivity over engagement (Lee 2005)-resulting in many urban students having damaged relationships with their teachers (Settlage and Meadows 2002) and damaged academic identities especially with respect to science (Olitsky 2006).…”
Section: Urban Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%