1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1983.tb02705.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
8

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
73
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Some examples of commodities that might usefully be standardized, but are not, include: video cassette recorders, many au-co parts,.... However, the bulk of standardization seems to be done through voluntary industry committees (see Kindleberger (1983))« This encourages us in our interpretation of standardisation as due mainly to network externalities as felt by producers.…”
Section: Footnoteŝmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of commodities that might usefully be standardized, but are not, include: video cassette recorders, many au-co parts,.... However, the bulk of standardization seems to be done through voluntary industry committees (see Kindleberger (1983))« This encourages us in our interpretation of standardisation as due mainly to network externalities as felt by producers.…”
Section: Footnoteŝmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating the benefits from education, for instance, one quickly runs into the problem of a large range of spillovers, the social benefits of which are not easily captured. Kindleberger (1983) extends Adam Smith's list of public goods as a necessary requirement for free trade with so-called 'elusive "goods"' among which are 'macroeconomic stability, redistribution of national income, the monetary system, and . .…”
Section: Some Further Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economists have primarily been interested in how technical standard setting affects market processes and under which circumstances they have positive or negative effects on competition (e.g. Kindleberger 2000). Political scientists have been interested in technical standardisation because of its crucial influence on technical development and the possibilities this could offer for political influence.…”
Section: Credit Rating As Standardisingmentioning
confidence: 99%