2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardizing ordinal subadult age indicators: Testing for observer agreement and consistency across modalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study showed no differences in long bone lengths and dental development between the deceased (medical examiner's office context) and living (hospital/clinical context) individuals from the U.S. and South African samples [10]. Although these findings should be verified on the other SVAD samples, they suggest there is no bias in skeletal and dental indicators that is related to the type of collaborating institution, the context of origin of the individuals (forensic or clinical), or the type of medical image (CT scan or radiograph), and that these indicators could be compared across samples for anthropological research [28].…”
Section: Collaborations Contributions and Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A recent study showed no differences in long bone lengths and dental development between the deceased (medical examiner's office context) and living (hospital/clinical context) individuals from the U.S. and South African samples [10]. Although these findings should be verified on the other SVAD samples, they suggest there is no bias in skeletal and dental indicators that is related to the type of collaborating institution, the context of origin of the individuals (forensic or clinical), or the type of medical image (CT scan or radiograph), and that these indicators could be compared across samples for anthropological research [28].…”
Section: Collaborations Contributions and Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Stacks of two-dimensional images, such as CT scans and MRIs, have the advantages of radiography (i.e., the ability to see beyond the external surfaces), but the additional benefit of alleviating orientation, position ambiguity, magnification, and superimposition issues that are inherent to two-dimensional radiograph imaging. The possibility for visualizing internal structures and high image resolution have proven time and again that the rendered image series [21][22][23][24][25] and the specific derivatives, such as segmented bone surfaces and the skeletal and dental variables collected directly from the image series or the virtual reconstructions, are reliable and accurate [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: The Need For Contemporary Subadult Reference Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations