2019
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardizing Measurement of Contraceptive Use Among Unmarried Women

Abstract: Because contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning estimates for unmarried women vary widely depending on the chosen sexual recency inclusion factor, all data platforms should adopt a 1-month window in these calculations to have comparable and actionable estimates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in some countries, higher proportions of these women use contraception than do their married counterparts of the same age, partly because many young married women are seeking their first births. Measurement issues are discussed by Fabic and Jadhay ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some countries, higher proportions of these women use contraception than do their married counterparts of the same age, partly because many young married women are seeking their first births. Measurement issues are discussed by Fabic and Jadhay ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,10,11 Women who are infecund or who are unmarried and have not had sex in the last 30 days are considered to have no need for contraception. 12 A major criticism of the measure has been that the unmet need definition does not include questions about whether women want or intend to use contraception. 13 Over time, unmet need went from solely a demographic measure to a key indicator used to measure progress across global calls to action, including Millennium Development Goal 5b.…”
Section: Historical Perspective Of Need-based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was restricted to married or in-union women because of the assumption that they are at increased risk of pregnancy and may be more interested in limiting childbearing compared to unmarried women. Cultural sensitivity in some African settings may also result in reporting bias on contraceptive use among unmarried women which was another reason for their exclusion [71].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%