2008
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1078745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardized Remission Criteria in Schizophrenia: Descriptive Validity and Comparability with Previously Used Outcome Measures

Abstract: The results indicate a high descriptive validity of the symptom-severity component of the proposed remission definition. However, the new criteria differ partially from previously used outcome measures. This aspect should be considered in the interpretation of clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that baseline data from an ongoing, prospective follow-up study was used, as suggested by the Remission of Schizophrenia Working Group severity was adopted in evaluating clinical remission, whilst duration was not taken into account. Moreover, to define a state of clinical remission [47], a CGI-SCH score equal or less than 3 was required. Given that the criteria published by Andreasen for clinical remission are based on eight selected items from PANSS, thus excluding all items which significantly contribute towards overall clinical picture and quality of life, such as depressive and other symptoms [48], we decided to apply other more restrictive criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that baseline data from an ongoing, prospective follow-up study was used, as suggested by the Remission of Schizophrenia Working Group severity was adopted in evaluating clinical remission, whilst duration was not taken into account. Moreover, to define a state of clinical remission [47], a CGI-SCH score equal or less than 3 was required. Given that the criteria published by Andreasen for clinical remission are based on eight selected items from PANSS, thus excluding all items which significantly contribute towards overall clinical picture and quality of life, such as depressive and other symptoms [48], we decided to apply other more restrictive criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, at stable state, both positive and negative symptoms have been shown to covary with elevated bilirubin [12] , a fi nding that might be confi ned to schizophrenia rather than ATPD patients who are supposed to fully recover after acute psychosis (although note that full recovery is diffi cult to operationalise, [7] ). More importantly, diff erent aetiology of acute psychoses and schizophrenia has been proposed and might account for diff ering bilirubin levels.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comorbid OCS in schizophrenia is associated with pronounced positive and negative symptoms [7], lower levels of social functioning, higher treatment costs, worse social and vocational rehabilitation. Consequently they have a less favourable prognosis [8-11], in particular if recent concepts of response, remission and recovery [12,13] are applied. These well-documented facts correct former concepts, where comorbid OCS in schizophrenia were assumed to have protective effects regarding psychotic desintegration [14-18].…”
Section: Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%