2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardized Measurement of Femoral Artery Depth by Computed Tomography to Predict Vascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen studies (65.2%) evaluated iliofemoral tortuosity for predicting vascular complications (Table ). Vessel tortuosity was assessed semi‐quantitatively by subjectively grading the severity of tortuosity in 11 (73.3%) studies 15,17,19–24,29,30,32 . Vessel tortuosity was measured objectively using quantitative methods in 4 (26.7%) studies by calculating iliofemoral tortuosity score ([true centreline vessel length/ideal vessel length) − 1) × 100]), 34,35 maximal degree of angulation, 18,35 sum of all angles 10 and degrees of angulation per centimeter of a vessel 27 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fifteen studies (65.2%) evaluated iliofemoral tortuosity for predicting vascular complications (Table ). Vessel tortuosity was assessed semi‐quantitatively by subjectively grading the severity of tortuosity in 11 (73.3%) studies 15,17,19–24,29,30,32 . Vessel tortuosity was measured objectively using quantitative methods in 4 (26.7%) studies by calculating iliofemoral tortuosity score ([true centreline vessel length/ideal vessel length) − 1) × 100]), 34,35 maximal degree of angulation, 18,35 sum of all angles 10 and degrees of angulation per centimeter of a vessel 27 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vessel tortuosity was assessed semi-quantitatively by subjectively grading the severity of tortuosity in 11 (73.3%) studies. 15,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]29,30,32 Vessel tortuosity was measured objectively using quantitative methods in 4 (26.7%) studies by calculating iliofemoral tortuosity score ([true centreline vessel length/ ideal vessel length) − 1) × 100]), 34,35 maximal degree of angulation, 18,35 sum of all angles 10 and degrees of angulation per centimeter of a vessel. 27 Four studies (26.7%) identified a significant association between the extent of vessel tortuosity and vascular complications.…”
Section: Vessel Tortuositymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ilio-femoral calcification was appraised according to Okuyama et al, awarding 2 points in case of moderate or severe calcification, 1 point in case of mild calcification, and 0 points in case of no calcification 36 . Access size ≤ 6.0 mm yielded a 1 point, whereas > 6.0 mm yielded 0 points 37 . Finally, planned aortic, apical, carotid, caval or subclavian access yielded 2 points, planned axillary access yielded 1 point, and planned femoral access yielded 0 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…14 CFA depth was determined as the distance between the skin and the center point of the CFA, as described previously. 18 The primary endpoint of this study was MANTA-related VC at 30 days after TAVI. VC was defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria, 19 and MANTA-related VC was defined as the access site-related VC that occurred because of MANTA usage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%